Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32800024›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2019

Contextual factors influencing the implementation of innovations in community-based primary health care: the experience of 12 Canadian research teams.

Jenny Ploeg, Sabrina T Wong, Kasra Hassani, Marie-Lee Yous, Martin Fortin, Claire Kendall, Clare Liddy, Maureen Markle-Reid, Bojana Petrovic, Emilie Dionne and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Jenny PloegDepartment of Health, Aging and Society, School of Nursing, Scientific Director, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Associate Member, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8168-8449
Sabrina T WongSchool of Nursing and Director, Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kasra HassaniSchool of Nursing and Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Marie-Lee YousSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Martin FortinDepartment of Family Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Claire KendallC.T. Lamont Primary Healthcare Research Group, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Clare LiddyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Maureen Markle-ReidDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, School of Nursing and Associate Member, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Bojana PetrovicPhD Student, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Emilie DionneSt. Mary's Research Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Cathie M ScottDepartment of Community Health Sciences & Sociology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Walter P WodchisInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Research Chair in Implementation and Evaluation Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Toronto · CABruyère · CAHamilton Health Sciences · CAImpact · CAMcMaster University · CASt Mary's Hospital Centre · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

CIHR 128265CIHR 128272CIHR 130729CIHR FRN TT5-128270CIHR TT2-128268CIHR TT5-128270CIHR TTF-128261CIHR TTF-128263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this paper are to: (1) identify contextual factors such as policy that impacted the implementation of community-based primary health care (CBPHC) innovations among 12 Canadian research teams and (2) describe strategies used by the teams to address contextual factors influencing implementation of CBPHC innovations. In primary care settings, consideration of contextual factors when implementing change has been recognized as critically important to success. However, contextual factors are rarely recorded, analyzed or considered when implementing change. The lack of consideration of contextual factors has negative implications not only for successfully implementing primary health care (PHC) innovations, but also for their sustainability and scalability. For this evaluation, data collection was conducted using self-administered questionnaires and follow-up telephone interviews with team representatives. We used a combination of directed and conventional content analysis approaches to analyze the questionnaire and interview data. Representatives from all 12 teams completed the questionnaire and 11 teams participated in the interviews; 40 individuals participated in this evaluation. Four themes representing contextual factors that impacted the implementation of CBPHC innovations were identified: (I) diversity of jurisdictions (II) complexity of interactions and collaborations (III) policy, and (IV) the multifaceted nature of PHC. The teams used six strategies to address these contextual factors including: (1) conduct an environmental scan at the beginning (2) maintaining engagement among partners and stakeholders by encouraging open and inclusive communication; (3) contextualizing the innovation for different settings; (4) anticipating and addressing changes, delays, and the need for additional resources; (5) fostering a culture of research and innovation among partners and stakeholders; and (6) ensuring information about the innovation is widely available. Implementing CBPHC innovations across jurisdictions is complex and involves navigating through multiple contextual factors. Awareness of the dynamic nature of context should be considered when implementing innovations.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDiffusion of InnovationHealth PolicyIntersectoral CollaborationAdultCanadaCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQualitative Researchcontexthealth care innovationsimplementationprimary care

Identifiers

PMID32800024
PMCPMC8060818
OpenAlexW2954126289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.