Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32800019›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2019

Association between access to health-promoting facilities and participation in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk screening among populations with low socioeconomic status (SES) in Singapore.

Ka Keat Lim, Charmaine Lim, Yu Heng Kwan, Sui Yung Chan, Warren Fong, Lian Leng Low, Hung Yong Tay, Truls Østbye, Chuen Seng Tan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ka Keat LimProgramme in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2340-4097
Charmaine LimDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Yu Heng KwanProgramme in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Sui Yung ChanDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Warren FongDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Lian Leng LowDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Hung Yong TaySingapore Heart Foundation, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Truls ØstbyeProgramme in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Chuen Seng TanSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGSingapore General Hospital · SGSingapore Heart Foundation · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow socioeconomic status (SES) is a barrier for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk screening and a determinant of poor CVD outcomes. This study examined the associations between access to health-promoting facilities and participation in a CVD risk screening program among populations with low SES residing in public rental flats in Singapore.

methodsData from Health Mapping Exercises conducted from 2013 to 2015 were obtained, and screening participation rates of 66 blocks were calculated. Negative binomial regression was used to test for associations between distances to four nearest facilities (i.e., subsidized private clinics, healthy eateries, public polyclinics, and parks) and block participation rate in CVD screening. We also investigated potential heterogeneity in the association across regions with an interaction term between distance to each facility and region.

resultsThe analysis consisted of 2069 participants. The associations were only evident in the North/North-East region for subsidized private clinic and park. Specifically, increasing distance to the nearest subsidized private clinic and park was significantly associated with lower [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-0.98] and higher (IRR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.15-3.25) screening participation rates respectively.

conclusionsOur findings could potentially inform the planning of future door-to-door screenings in urban settings for optimal prioritization of resources. To increase participation rates in low SES populations, accessibility to subsidized private clinics and parks in a high population density region should be considered.

Indexed as

AdultCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalePovertyRisk FactorsSingaporeSocioeconomic FactorsUrban Populationcardiovascular diseasemedical screeningpreventionscreeningsocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID32800019
PMCPMC6609976
OpenAlexW2954178548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.