Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32800011›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2019

Development and validation of the Vietnamese Primary Care Assessment Tool - provider version.

Nguyen Thi Hoa, Anselme Derese, Jeffrey F Markuns, Nguyen Minha Tam, Wim Peersman

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nguyen Thi HoaDepartment of Family Medicine, Hue Universityof Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-2866-1519
Anselme DereseDepartment of Public Healthand Primary Care, Campus UZ 6K3, Gent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9137-4371
Jeffrey F MarkunsGlobal Health Collaborative, Department of Family Medicine, Boston University,Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8044-2575
Nguyen Minha TamDepartment of Family Medicine, Hue Universityof Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-8505-677X
Wim PeersmanResearch Group Social Work, Odisee University College, Brussel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4276-7408
Hue University · VNBoston University · USGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo adapt the provider version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) for Vietnam and determine its internal consistency and validity.

backgroundThere is a growing need to measure and explore the impact of various characteristics of health care systems on the quality of primary care. It would provide the best evidence for policy makers if these evaluations come from both the demand and supply sides of the health care sector. Comparatively more researchers have studied primary care quality from the consumer perspective than from the provider's perspective. This study aims at the latter.

methodOur study translated and adapted the PCAT provider version (PCAT PE) into a Vietnamese version, after which a cross-sectional survey was conducted to examine the feasibility, internal consistency and validity of the Vietnamese PCAT provider version (VN PCAT PE). All general doctors working at 152 commune health centres in Thua Thien Hue province had been selected to participate in the survey.

findingsThe VN PCAT PE is an instrument for evaluation of primary care in Vietnam with 116 items comprising six scales representing four core primary care domains, and three additional scales representing three derivative domains. From the translation and cultural adaptation stage, two items were combined, two items were removed and one item was added. Six other items were excluded due to problems in item-total correlations. All items have a low non-response or 'don't know/don't remember' response rate, and there were no floor or ceiling effects. All scales had a Cronbach's alpha above 0.80, except for the Coordination scale, which still was above the minimum level of 0.70.

conclusionThe VN PCAT PE demonstrates adequate internal consistency and validity to be used as an effective tool for measuring the quality of primary care in Vietnam from the provider perspective.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelTranslatingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CarePsychometricsQuality of Health CareReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesVietnamassessmentprimary care qualityprovider perspectives

Identifiers

PMID32800011
PMCPMC6609979
OpenAlexW2954868400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.