Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32800009›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2019

Are people's health care needs better met when primary care is strong? A synthesis of the results of the QUALICOPC study in 34 countries.

Willemijn L A Schäfer, Wienke G W Boerma, Michael J van den Berg, Jan De Maeseneer, Sabina De Rosis, Jens Detollenaere, Stefan Greß, Stephanie Heinemann, Tessa van Loenen, Anna Maria Murante and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. "The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2023
    Article
  11. Primary and Community Care Transformation in Post-COVID Era: Nationwide General Practitioner Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Willemijn L A SchäferDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 633 N. St Clair Street, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0745-0226
Wienke G W BoermaNIVEL - Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO box 1568, 3500BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michael J van den BergAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam.
Jan De MaeseneerDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, Belgium.
Sabina De RosisScuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Institute of Management, Laboratorio Management e Sanità, piazza Martiti della Libertà 33, Pisa 56127, Italy.
Jens DetollenaereKCE - Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, Kruidtuinlaan 55, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Stefan GreßDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Fulda, Leipziger Str. 123, 36037 Fulda, Germany.
Stephanie HeinemannDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Fulda, Leipziger Str. 123, 36037 Fulda, Germany.
Tessa van LoenenPharos - Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, PO box 13318, 3507 LH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anna Maria MuranteScuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Institute of Management, Laboratorio Management e Sanità, piazza Martiti della Libertà 33, Pisa 56127, Italy.
Danica R PavličDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Chiara SeghieriScuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Institute of Management, Laboratorio Management e Sanità, piazza Martiti della Libertà 33, Pisa 56127, Italy.
Milena VainieriScuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Institute of Management, Laboratorio Management e Sanità, piazza Martiti della Libertà 33, Pisa 56127, Italy.
Sara WillemsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, Belgium.
Peter P GroenewegenNIVEL - Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO box 1568, 3500BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis article synthesises the results of a large international study on primary care (PC), the QUALICOPC study.

backgroundSince the Alma Ata Declaration, strengthening PC has been high on the policy agenda. PC is associated with positive health outcomes, but it is unclear how care processes and structures relate to patient experiences.

methodsSurvey data were collected during 2011-2013 from approximately 7000 PC physicians and 70 000 patients in 34, mainly European, countries. The data on the patients are linked to data on the PC physicians within each country and analysed using multilevel modelling.

findingsPatients had more positive experiences when their PC physician provided a broader range of services. However, a broader range of services is also associated with higher rates of hospitalisations for uncontrolled diabetes, but rates of avoidable diabetes-related hospitalisations were lower in countries where patients had a continuous relationship with PC physicians. Additionally, patients with a long-term relationship with their PC physician were less likely to attend the emergency department. Capitation payment was associated with more positive patient experiences. Mono- and multidisciplinary co-location was related to improved processes in PC, but the experiences of patients visiting multidisciplinary practices were less positive. A stronger national PC structure and higher overall health care expenditures are related to more favourable patient experiences for continuity and comprehensiveness. The study also revealed inequities: patients with a migration background reported less positive experiences. People with lower incomes more often postponed PC visits for financial reasons. Comprehensive and accessible care processes are related to less postponement of care.

conclusionsThe study revealed room for improvement related to patient-reported experiences and highlighted the importance of core PC characteristics including a continuous doctor-patient relationship as well as a broad range of services offered by PC physicians.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAustraliaCanadaEuropeFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHospitalizationHumansInternationalityMaleNew ZealandPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth Services Researchprimary care

Identifiers

PMID32800009
PMCPMC6609545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.