Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32799911›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2020

Impact of two-level filtering on emergency medical communication center triage during the COVID-19 pandemic: an uncontrolled before-after study.

Y Penverne, B Leclere, J Labady, F Berthier, J Jenvrin, F Javaudin, E Montassier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Factors affecting communication time in an emergency medical communication centers.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Y PenverneSamu 44, Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France. yann.penverne@chu-nantes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-4251
B LeclereDepartment of Medical Evaluation and Epidemiology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
J LabadySamu 44, Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
F BerthierSamu 44, Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
J JenvrinSamu 44, Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
F JavaudinSamu 44, Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
E MontassierSamu 44, Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid access to emergency medical communication centers (EMCCs) is pivotal to address potentially life-threatening conditions. Maintaining public access to EMCCs without delay is crucial in case of disease outbreak despite the significant increased activity and the difficulties to mobilize extra staff resources. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of two-level filtering on EMCC performance during the COVID-19 outbreak.

methodsA before-after monocentric prospective study was conducted at the EMCC at the Nantes University Hospital. Using telephone activity data, we compared EMCC performance during 2 periods. In period one (February 27th to March 11th 2020), call takers managed calls as usual, gathering basic information from the caller and giving first aid instructions to a bystander on scene if needed. During period two (March 12th to March 25th 2020), calls were answered by a first-line call taker to identify potentially serious conditions that required immediate dispatch. When a serious condition was excluded, the call was immediately transferred to a second-line call taker who managed the call as usual so the first-line call taker could be rapidly available for other incoming calls. The primary outcome was the quality of service at 20 s (QS20), corresponding to the rate of calls answered within 20 s. We described activity and outcome measures by hourly range. We compared EMCC performance during periods one and two using an interrupted time series analysis.

resultsWe analyzed 45,451 incoming calls during the two study periods: 21,435 during period 1 and 24,016 during period 2. Between the two study periods, we observed a significant increase in the number of incoming calls per hour, the number of connected call takers and average call duration. A linear regression model, adjusted for these confounding variables, showed a significant increase in the QS20 slope (from - 0.4 to 1.4%, p = 0.01), highlighting the significant impact of two-level filtering on the quality of service.

conclusionsWe found that rapid access to our EMCC was maintained during the COVID-19 pandemic via two-level filtering. This system helped reduce the time gap between call placement and first-line call-taker evaluation of a potentially life-threatening situation. We suggest implementing this system when an EMCC faces significantly increased activity with limited staff resources.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCommunicationEmergenciesControlled Before-After StudiesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Emergency Medical Service Communication SystemsEmergency Medical ServicesHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2TelephoneTriageAccessibilityEmergency medical communication centerSystemTriage

Identifiers

PMID32799911
PMCPMC7427752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.