Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32799881›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2020

Epigenetic tuning of brain signal entropy in emergent human social behavior.

Meghan H Puglia, Kathleen M Krol, Manuela Missana, Cabell L Williams, Travis S Lillard, James P Morris, Jessica J Connelly, Tobias Grossmann

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An epigenetic rheostat of experience: DNA methylation ofComprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Meghan H PugliaDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA. meghan.puglia@virginia.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5450-0631
Kathleen M KrolDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.
Manuela MissanaMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Cabell L WilliamsDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.
Travis S LillardDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.
James P MorrisDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.
Jessica J ConnellyDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.
Tobias GrossmannDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.
University of Virginia · USMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DELeipzig University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

The Noisy Brain in Infancy: A Neurobiological Marker of Normative Social DevelopmentF31HD090865 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI PUGLIA, MEGHAN H · 2017 to 2018
$65k
National Science Foundation 1729289NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD090865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHow the brain develops accurate models of the external world and generates appropriate behavioral responses is a vital question of widespread multidisciplinary interest. It is increasingly understood that brain signal variability-posited to enhance perception, facilitate flexible cognitive representations, and improve behavioral outcomes-plays an important role in neural and cognitive development. The ability to perceive, interpret, and respond to complex and dynamic social information is particularly critical for the development of adaptive learning and behavior. Social perception relies on oxytocin-regulated neural networks that emerge early in development.

methodsWe tested the hypothesis that individual differences in the endogenous oxytocinergic system early in life may influence social behavioral outcomes by regulating variability in brain signaling during social perception. In study 1, 55 infants provided a saliva sample at 5 months of age for analysis of individual differences in the oxytocinergic system and underwent electroencephalography (EEG) while listening to human vocalizations at 8 months of age for the assessment of brain signal variability. Infant behavior was assessed via parental report. In study 2, 60 infants provided a saliva sample and underwent EEG while viewing faces and objects and listening to human speech and water sounds at 4 months of age. Infant behavior was assessed via parental report and eye tracking.

resultsWe show in two independent infant samples that increased brain signal entropy during social perception is in part explained by an epigenetic modification to the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) and accounts for significant individual differences in social behavior in the first year of life. These results are measure-, context-, and modality-specific: entropy, not standard deviation, links OXTR methylation and infant behavior; entropy evoked during social perception specifically explains social behavior only; and only entropy evoked during social auditory perception predicts infant vocalization behavior.

conclusionsDemonstrating these associations in infancy is critical for elucidating the neurobiological mechanisms accounting for individual differences in cognition and behavior relevant to neurodevelopmental disorders. Our results suggest that an epigenetic modification to the oxytocin receptor gene and brain signal entropy are useful indicators of social development and may hold potential diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic value.

Indexed as

EEGInfant developmentMultiscale entropyOXTR epigeneticsSocial perception

Identifiers

PMID32799881
PMCPMC7429788
OpenAlexW3049690675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.