ArticleMalaria journal2020
Effectiveness of the innovative 1,7-malaria reactive community-based testing and response (1, 7-mRCTR) approach on malaria burden reduction in Southeastern Tanzania.
Article in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Systematic review of evidence for the impact and effectiveness of the 1-3-7 strategy for malaria elimination.Malaria journal · 2024Pooled it
- Testing and treatment for malaria elimination: a systematic review.Malaria journal · 2023Pooled it
- The Institution-based Network on China-Africa Cooperation for Malaria Elimination: fostering a transcontinental hub for strengthening China-Africa cooperation on malaria control and elimination efforts.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2026Article
- The pros and cons of China's health role in Africa.Nature · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic health equity with malaria burden: quantifying slope (Relative) index of inequity in malaria infection outcomes in the Southeastern-coastal Tanzania.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- The 24, 2 hours initiative: a game changer in malaria mortality reduction.Malaria journal · 2025Review
- Impact of Implementation Interruptions of 1,7-Malaria Reactive Community-Based Testing and Response Approach on Malaria Control Efforts - Southern Tanzania.China CDC weekly · 2025Article
- Long term monitoring and adaptive strategies: lessons from Hainan's malaria elimination and prevention efforts.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Stratified sustainable vector control strategies and measures for malaria control and elimination in China: a 70 year journey.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- The 1,7-malaria reactive community-based testing and response (1,7-mRCTR) approach in Tanzania: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2024Article
- Current Status of Malaria Control and Elimination in Africa: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, Progress and Challenges.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2024Review
- China's hidden role in malaria control and elimination in Africa.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Impact of 1,7-malaria reactive community-based testing and response (1,7-mRCTR) approach on malaria prevalence in Tanzania.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2023Article
- China's application of the One Health approach in addressing public health threats at the human-animal-environment interface: Advances and challenges.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Exploring activities and behaviours potentially increases school-age children's vulnerability to malaria infections in south-eastern Tanzania.Malaria journal · 2023Article
- The "Paired Learning by Doing" Approach for Capacity Building Derived from the China-UK-Tanzania Pilot Project on Malaria Control During 2015-2018.China CDC weekly · 2023Article
- 1-3-7 surveillance and response approach in malaria elimination: China's practice and global adaptions.Malaria journal · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn 2015, a China-UK-Tanzania tripartite pilot project was implemented in southeastern Tanzania to explore a new model for reducing malaria burden and possibly scaling-out the approach into other malaria-endemic countries. The 1,7-malaria Reactive Community-based Testing and Response (1,7-mRCTR) which is a locally-tailored approach for reporting febrile malaria cases in endemic villages was developed to stop transmission and Plasmodium life-cycle. The (1,7-mRCTR) utilizes existing health facility data and locally trained community health workers to conduct community-level testing and treatment.
methodsThe pilot project was implemented from September 2015 to June 2018 in Rufiji District, southern Tanzania. The study took place in four wards, two with low incidence and two with a higher incidence. One ward of each type was selected for each of the control and intervention arms. The control wards implemented the existing Ministry of Health programmes. The 1,7-mRCTR activities implemented in the intervention arm included community testing and treatment of malaria infection. Malaria case-to-suspect ratios at health facilities (HF) were aggregated by villages, weekly to identify the village with the highest ratio. Community-based mobile test stations (cMTS) were used for conducting mass testing and treatment. Baseline (pre) and endline (post) household surveys were done in the control and intervention wards to assess the change in malaria prevalence measured by the interaction term of 'time' (post vs pre) and arm in a logistic model. A secondary analysis also studied the malaria incidence reported at the HFs during the intervention.
resultsOverall the 85 rounds of 1,7-mRCTR conducted in the intervention wards significantly reduced the odds of malaria infection by 66% (adjusted OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.26,0.44, p < 0001) beyond the effect of the standard programmes. Malaria prevalence in the intervention wards declined by 81% (from 26% (95% CI 23.7, 7.8), at baseline to 4.9% (95% CI 4.0, 5.9) at endline). In villages receiving the 1,7-mRCTR, the short-term case ratio decreased by over 15.7% (95% CI - 33, 6) compared to baseline.
conclusionThe 1,7-mRCTR approach significantly reduced the malaria burden in the areas of high transmission in rural southern Tanzania. This locally tailored approach could accelerate malaria control and elimination efforts. The results provide the impetus for further evaluation of the effectiveness and scaling up of this approach in other high malaria burden countries in Africa, including Tanzania.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.