Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32799849›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Protocol for Minute Calisthenics: a randomized controlled study of a daily, habit-based, bodyweight resistance training program.

Joshua C Hollingsworth, Kaelin C Young, Siraj F Abdullah, Danielle D Wadsworth, Ahmad Abukhader, Bari Elfenbein, Zachary Holley

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04207567 (Minute Calisthenics), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04207567 nacompletednot on this map

Minute Calisthenics: A Daily, Habit-Based, Bodyweight Resistance-Training Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorEdward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic MedicineRan2019 to 2021Enrolled47ConditionsResistance TrainingArmsBodyweight exercises (push-ups, angled-rows, bodyweight squats) on weekdays
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua C HollingsworthEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine - Auburn Campus, 910 South Donahue Drive, Auburn, AL, 36832, USA. jhollingsworth@auburn.vcom.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5043-3160
Kaelin C YoungEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine - Auburn Campus, 910 South Donahue Drive, Auburn, AL, 36832, USA.
Siraj F AbdullahEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine - Auburn Campus, 910 South Donahue Drive, Auburn, AL, 36832, USA.
Danielle D WadsworthAuburn University, School of Kinesiology, 301 Wire Road, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Ahmad AbukhaderEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine - Auburn Campus, 910 South Donahue Drive, Auburn, AL, 36832, USA.
Bari ElfenbeinEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine - Auburn Campus, 910 South Donahue Drive, Auburn, AL, 36832, USA.
Zachary HolleyEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine - Auburn Campus, 910 South Donahue Drive, Auburn, AL, 36832, USA.
Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine · USAuburn University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResistance-training (RT) provides significant health benefits. However, roughly 3/4 of adults in the United States do not meet current Physical Activity Guidelines in this regard. There has been a call for research examining the effectiveness of interventions to increase participation in physical activity and to better understand the dose response relationship upon health outcomes. Studies are needed that assess the effectiveness of RT programs that are time-efficient and simple to perform. This fully-powered, randomized controlled study will assess a habit-based RT program consisting of one set of push-ups, angled-rows, and bodyweight-squats performed every weekday for 12-24 weeks in untrained individuals.

methodsForty-60 untrained osteopathic medical students and college/university employees who work in an office setting will be recruited and randomized (1:1) to an intervention or waitlist control group. After 12-week follow-up assessment, the intervention group will continue the program and the control group will initiate the program for 12 weeks. In addition to the equipment and training needed to safely perform the exercises, all participants will receive training in the Tiny Habits® Method (THM) and digital coaching for the duration of the study. Participants will complete weekly assessments regarding the program during their initial 12-week intervention phase. The primary outcome is the change from baseline to 12 weeks in the intervention group versus the control group, in the combined number of repetitions performed in one set of each of the three exercises (composite repetitions) under a standardized protocol. Secondary outcomes include adherence to and satisfaction with the program, and change from baseline to 12- and 24-week follow-up in blood pressure, fasting lipid panel, hemoglobin A1c, body mass index, anthropometry, body composition, mid-thigh muscle thickness, and habit strength. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate a simple, habit-based RT intervention in untrained individuals. The approach is unique in that it utilizes brief but frequent bodyweight exercises and, via the THM, focuses on consistency and habit formation first, with effort being increased as participants are motivated and able. If effective, the program can be easily scaled for wider adoption.

trial registrationThis study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04207567 , on December 23rd, 2019.

Indexed as

HabitsAdultFemaleGymnasticsHumansMaleProgram EvaluationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignResistance TrainingBehavior changeExerciseHabit formationResistance training

Identifiers

PMID32799849
PMCPMC7429724
OpenAlexW3049436630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.