Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32799820›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2020

Emergency department clinical leads' experiences of implementing primary care services where GPs work in or alongside emergency departments in the UK: a qualitative study.

Michelle Edwards, Alison Cooper, Freya Davies, Rebecca Sherlock, Andrew Carson-Stevens, Delyth Price, Alison Porter, Bridie Evans, Saiful Islam, Helen Snooks and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Implementing public involvement throughout the research process-Experience and learning from the GPs in EDs study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Perspectives of GPs working in or alongside emergency departments in England: qualitative findings from the GPs and Emergency Departments Study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  8. Identifying safe care processes when GPs work in or alongside emergency departments: a realist evaluation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Michelle EdwardsDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK. Edwardsm28@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7432-2828
Alison CooperDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Freya DaviesDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Rebecca SherlockDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Andrew Carson-StevensDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Delyth PriceDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Alison PorterSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Bridie EvansSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Saiful IslamSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Helen SnooksSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Pippa AndersonSwansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Aloysius Niroshan SiriwardenaCommunity and Health Research Unit, School of Health & Social Care, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Peter HibbertCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia.
Thomas HughesEmergency Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Matthew CookeWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Jeremy DaleAcademic Primary Care, Warwick University, Coventry, UK.
Adrian EdwardsDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 15/145/04Health Services and Delivery Research Programme 15/145/04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo manage increasing demand for emergency and unscheduled care NHS England policy has promoted services in which patients presenting to Emergency Departments (EDs) with non-urgent problems are directed to general practitioners (GPs) and other primary care clinicians working within or alongside emergency departments. However, the ways that hospitals have implemented primary care services in EDs are varied. The aim of this study was to describe ED clinical leads' experiences of implementing and delivering 'primary care services' and 'emergency medicine services' where GPs were integrated into the ED team.

methodsWe conducted interviews with ED clinical leads in England (n = 19) and Wales (n = 2). We used framework analysis to analyse interview transcripts and explore differences across 'primary care services', 'emergency medicine services' and emergency departments without primary care services.

resultsIn EDs with separate primary care services, success was reported when having a distinct workforce of primary care clinicians, who improved waiting times and flow by seeing primary care-type patients in a timely way, using fewer investigations, and enabling ED doctors to focus on more acutely unwell patients. Some challenges were: trying to align their service with the policy guidance, inconsistent demand for primary care, accessible community primary care services, difficulties in recruiting GPs, lack of funding, difficulties in agreeing governance protocols and establishing effective streaming pathways. Where GPs were integrated into an ED workforce success was reported as managing the demand for both emergency and primary care and reducing admissions.

conclusionsIntroducing a policy advocating a preferred model of service to address primary care demand was not useful for all emergency departments. To support successful and sustainable primary care services in or alongside EDs, policy makers and commissioners should consider varied ways that GPs can be employed to manage variation in local demand and also local contextual factors such as the ability to recruit and retain GPs, sustainable funding, clear governance frameworks, training, support and guidance for all staff. Whether or not streaming to a separate primary care service is useful also depended on the level of primary care demand.

Indexed as

General PractitionersPhysician ExecutivesEmergency Service, HospitalHealth Services Needs and DemandHospital Distribution SystemsHumansInterviews as TopicModels, OrganizationalPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchState MedicineTriageUnited KingdomWorkflowEmergency careGeneral practitionersUrgent care

Identifiers

PMID32799820
PMCPMC7429882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.