Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32799816›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2020

Weighted single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction integrating variants selected from sequencing data by association and bioinformatics analyses.

Aoxing Liu, Mogens Sandø Lund, Didier Boichard, Emre Karaman, Bernt Guldbrandtsen, Sebastien Fritz, Gert Pedersen Aamand, Ulrik Sander Nielsen, Goutam Sahana, Yachun Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. AGHmatrix: genetic relationship matrices in R.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Accounting for genetic architecture for body weight improves accuracy of predicting breeding values in a commercial line of broilers.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aoxing LiuCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark. aoxing.liu@qgg.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9155-1494
Mogens Sandø LundCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Didier BoichardINRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Emre KaramanCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Bernt GuldbrandtsenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Sebastien FritzINRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Gert Pedersen AamandNordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Ulrik Sander NielsenSeges, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Goutam SahanaCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Yachun WangKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, MARA; National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, 100193, Beijing, P.R. China.
Guosheng SuCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSequencing data enable the detection of causal loci or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) highly linked to causal loci to improve genomic prediction. However, until now, studies on integrating such SNPs using a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) model are scarce. We investigated the integration of sequencing SNPs selected by association (1262 SNPs) and bioinformatics (2359 SNPs) analyses into the currently used 54K-SNP chip, using three ssGBLUP models which make different assumptions on the distribution of SNP effects: a basic ssGBLUP model, a so-called featured ssGBLUP (ssFGBLUP) model that considered selected sequencing SNPs as a feature genetic component, and a weighted ssGBLUP (ssWGBLUP) model in which the genomic relationship matrix was weighted by the SNP variances estimated from a Bayesian whole-genome regression model, with every 1, 30, or 100 adjacent SNPs within a chromosome region sharing the same variance. We used data on milk production and female fertility in Danish Jersey. In total, 15,823 genotyped and 528,981‬ non-genotyped females born between 1990 and 2013 were used as reference population and 7415 genotyped females and 33,040 non-genotyped females born between 2014 and 2016 were used as validation population.

resultsWith basic ssGBLUP, integrating SNPs selected from sequencing data improved prediction reliabilities for milk and protein yields, but resulted in limited or no improvement for fat yield and female fertility. Model performances depended on the SNP set used. When using ssWGBLUP with the 54K SNPs, reliabilities for milk and protein yields improved by 0.028 for genotyped animals and by 0.006 for non-genotyped animals compared with ssGBLUP. However, with the SNP set that included SNPs selected from sequencing data, no statistically significant difference in prediction reliability was observed between the three ssGBLUP models.

conclusionsIn summary, when using 54K SNPs, a ssWGBLUP model with a common weight on the SNPs in a given region is a feasible approach for single-trait genetic evaluation. Integrating relevant SNPs selected from sequencing data into the standard SNP chip can improve the reliability of genomic prediction. Based on such SNP data, a basic ssGBLUP model was suggested since no significant improvement was observed from using alternative models such as ssWGBLUP and ssFGBLUP.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsBayes TheoremCattleChromosomesComputational BiologyFemaleFertilityGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotyping TechniquesLactationMilkQuantitative Trait, HeritableQuantitative Trait LociSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID32799816
PMCPMC7429790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.