Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32799763›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Gastric Cancer Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes.

Rachel E Sexton, Mohammed Najeeb Al Hallak, Md Hafiz Uddin, Maria Diab, Asfar S Azmi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Hypomethylation ofFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel E SextonDepartment of Oncology, 12267Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0008-9629
Mohammed Najeeb Al HallakDepartment of Oncology, 12267Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Md Hafiz UddinDepartment of Oncology, 12267Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Maria DiabDepartment of Oncology, 12267Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Asfar S AzmiDepartment of Oncology, 12267Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric adenocarcinoma is a highly aggressive disease with poor overall survival. The aggressive nature of this disease is in part due to the high intra and inter tumoral heterogeneity and also due to the late diagnosis at presentation. Once progression occurs, treatment is more difficult due to the adaptation of tumors, which acquires resistance to commonly used chemotherapeutics. In this report, using publicly available data sets and pathway analysis, we highlight the vast heterogeneity of gastric cancer by investigating genes found to be significantly perturbed. We found several upregulated genes in the diffuse gastric cancer subtypes share similarity to gastric cancer as a whole which can be explained by the increase in this subtype of gastric cancer throughout the world. We report significant downregulation of genes that are underrepresented within the literature, such as

Indexed as

Genetic HeterogeneityBiomarkers, TumorComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingPrognosisSex FactorsStomach NeoplasmsTranscriptomeBiomarkers, Tumorclassificationdifferential gene expressiongastric cancermicroRNAoncomine

Identifiers

PMID32799763
PMCPMC7432987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.