Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32799718›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care medicine2021

Variation in SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) Score Performance in Different Infectious States.

Rahul D Pawar, Jenny A Shih, Lakshman Balaji, Anne V Grossestreuer, Parth V Patel, Christopher K Hansen, Michael W Donnino, Ari Moskowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A framework and analytical exploration for a data-driven update of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in sepsis.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Viral load and disease severity in COVID-19.Internal and emergency medicine · 2022
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rahul D PawarDepartment of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-0129
Jenny A ShihDepartment of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0260-4679
Lakshman BalajiCenter for Resuscitation Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Anne V GrossestreuerCenter for Resuscitation Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Parth V PatelCenter for Resuscitation Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Christopher K HansenCenter for Resuscitation Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0224-2690
Michael W DonninoCenter for Resuscitation Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Ari MoskowitzCenter for Resuscitation Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Thiamine as a Renal Protective Agent in Septic ShockK23GM128005 · NIGMS · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI MOSKOWITZ, ARI · 2018 to 2021
$761k
NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM128005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn this study, we investigated whether the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score performance differs based on the type of infection among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with infection. MATERIALS AND

methodsSingle-center, retrospective study of adult ICU patients admitted with infection between January 2008 and April 2018 at an urban tertiary care center. Patients were uniquely classified into different infection types based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (

resultsA total of 12 283 patients were included. Of these, 50.6% were female and the median age was 70 years (interquartile range: 57-82). The most common infection types were pneumonia (32.2%) and UTI (31.0%). Overall, 1703 (13.9%) patients died prior to hospital discharge. The median baseline SOFA score (within 24 hours of ICU admission) for the cohort was 5 (3-8). Patients with peritonitis had the highest median SOFA score, 7 (4-9), and patients with cellulitis and UTI had the lowest median SOFA score, 4 (2-7). The SOFA score discrimination to predict mortality was highest among patients with endocarditis (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUC]: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.69-0.90) and lowest for patients with isolated bacteremia (AUC: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.49-0.70). Observed mortality by quartile of SOFA score differed substantially across infection types.

conclusionsType of infection is an important consideration when interpreting the SOFA score. This is relevant as SOFA emerges as an important tool in the definition and prognostication of sepsis.

Indexed as

Organ Dysfunction ScoresSepsisAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsPrognosisRetrospective Studiesarea under curveclinical decision-makingcritical caremortalityorgan dysfunction scoressepsis

Identifiers

PMID32799718
PMCPMC7941324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.