ArticleArthritis care & research2021
Cervical Cancer Screening in Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
Article in Arthritis care & research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cervical cancer screening practices among patients with autoimmune and inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a descriptive cross-sectional observational study.BMC women's health · 2026Observational
- Cancer incidence and the influence of immunosuppressive agents in Korean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2025Article
- Mortality in Antinuclear Antibody-Positive Patients with and Without Rheumatologic Immune-Related Disorders: A Large-Scale Population-Based Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Cancer in connective tissue disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Association between systemic lupus erythematosus and common female reproductive system malignancies.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Case report: Synchronous tumors of the female reproductive tract in systemic lupus erythematosus: report of two cases and review of the literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Researchers in rheumatology should avoid categorization of continuous predictor variables.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- RILPL2 is associated with the progression and prognosis of cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Utilization of preventive services in a systemic lupus erythematosus population-based cohort: a Lupus Midwest Network (LUMEN) study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine rates of cervical cancer screening and associated abnormal results in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
methodsWe identified women with an initial diagnosis of SLE in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database from 2001 to 2014. Cervical cancer screening rates and associated diagnostic claims within 3 years of the initial claim were determined. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association of screening with lupus treatment. A matched logistic regression analysis was conducted to compare screening rates to those in age-matched women without connective tissue disease.
resultsWe included 4,316 women with SLE. Screening rates were higher in women with SLE than in general controls (73.4% versus 58.5%; P < 0.001). Factors associated with decreased screening included recent time (odds ratio [OR] 0.70 [95% confidence interval (95% CI)] 0.55-0.89) (2012-2014 compared to 2001-2005), age ≥61 years (OR 0.27 [95% CI 0.18-0.39]), comorbidity score ≥2 (OR 0.71 [95% CI 0.6-0.83]), corticosteroid use (OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.61-0.97]), and use of immunosuppressants (OR 0.80 [95% CI 0.69-0.94]). Abnormal pathology result claims were more common in women with SLE than in general controls (12.3% versus 9.8%; P < 0.001).
conclusionThough with higher rates than the general cohort, over 25% of the patients with SLE were not screened, and screening rates seem to be decreasing over time. Patients with SLE are at higher risk of abnormal cervical screening test results than controls, supporting the need for regular screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.