Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32799005›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2020

Thyroid Ultrasound Reports: Will the Thyroid Imaging, Reporting, and Data System Improve Natural Language Processing Capture of Critical Thyroid Nodule Features?

Kallie J Chen, Priya H Dedhia, Joseph R Imbus, David F Schneider

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Surgeon's Field Guide to Value-Based Specialty Care.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Identification of pancreatic cancer risk factors from clinical notes using natural language processing.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kallie J ChenDivision of Endocrine Surgery at University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: kjchen3@wisc.edu.
Priya H DedhiaDivision of Endocrine Surgery at University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Madison, Wisconsin.
Joseph R ImbusDivision of Endocrine Surgery at University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Madison, Wisconsin.
David F SchneiderDivision of Endocrine Surgery at University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Madison, Wisconsin.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Surgery Summer Research Experience for Medical StudentsT35DK062709 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MEZRICH, JOSHUA D · 2006 to 2023
$870k
NIDDK NIH HHS T35 DK062709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical thyroid nodule features are contained in unstructured ultrasound (US) reports. The Thyroid Imaging, Reporting, and Data System (TI-RADS) uses five key features to risk stratify nodules and recommend appropriate intervention. This study aims to analyze the quality of US reporting and the potential benefit of Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems in efficiently capturing TI-RADS features from text reports. MATERIALS AND

methodThis retrospective study used free-text thyroid US reports from an academic center (A) and community hospital (B). Physicians created "gold standard" annotations by manually extracting TI-RADS features and clinical recommendations from reports to determine how often they were included. Similar annotations were created using an automated NLP system and compared with the gold standard.

resultsTwo hundred eighty-two reports contained 409 nodules at least 1-cm in maximum diameter. The gold standard identified three nodules (0.7%) which contained enough information to calculate a complete TI-RADS score. Shape was described most often (92.7% of nodules), whereas margins were described least often (11%). A median number of two TI-RADS features are reported per nodule. The NLP system was significantly less accurate than the gold standard in capturing echogenicity (27.5%) and margins (58.9%). One hundred eight nodule reports (26.4%) included clinical management recommendations, which were included more often at site A than B (33.9 versus 17%, P < 0.05).

conclusionsThese results suggest a gap between current US reporting styles and those needed to implement TI-RADS and achieve NLP accuracy. Synoptic reporting should prompt more complete thyroid US reporting, improved recommendations for intervention, and better NLP performance.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingAcademic Medical CentersData SystemsHospitals, CommunityHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPractice Guidelines as TopicRadiologyRetrospective StudiesSocieties, MedicalThyroid GlandThyroid NoduleUltrasonographyNatural language processingThyroidTI-RADSUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID32799005
PMCPMC8102071
OpenAlexW3049170103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.