ArticleClinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)2020
In silico optimization of targeted aerosol delivery in upper airways via Inhaled Volume Tracking.
Article in Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences between cigarette smoking and biomass smoke exposure: An in silico comparative assessment of particulate deposition in the lungs.Environmental research · 2021Article
- Focused targeting of inhaled magnetic aerosols in reconstructed in vitro airway models.Journal of biomechanics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the widespread use of aerosol inhalation as a drug delivery method, targeted delivery to the upper airways remains an ongoing challenge in the quest for improved clinical response in respiratory disease.
methodsHere, we examine in silico flow and particle dynamics when using an oral Inhaled Volume Tracking manoeuvre. A short pulsed aerosol bolus is injected during slow inhalation flow rates followed by clean air, and a breath-hold is initiated once it reaches the desired depth. We explore the fate of a broad particle size range (1-40 μm) for both upright and supine positions.
findingsOur findings illustrate that despite attempts to mitigate dispersion using slower flow rates, the laryngeal jet disperses the aerosol bolus and thus remains a hurdle for efficient targeted delivery. Nevertheless, we show a decrease in extra-thoracic deposition; large aerosols in the range of 10-30 μm potentially outperform existing inhalation methods, showing deposition fractions of up to 80% in an upright orientation.
interpretationThe improved deposition during Inhaled Volume Tracking shows promise for clinical applications and could be leveraged to deliver larger payloads to the upper airways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.