Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32798323›Full record

ArticleThe Laryngoscope2021

Reducing Aerosolized Particles and Droplet Spread in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery during COVID-19.

Huw A S Jones, Rami J Salib, Philip G Harries

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Laryngoscope, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. One year into the COVID-19 pandemic: What do we know so far from studies assessing risk and mitigation of droplet aerosolisation during endonasal surgery? A systematic review.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. COVID-19 and rhinological surgery.Operative techniques in otolaryngology--head and neck surgery · 2022
    Article
  4. Risk of SARS-CoV-2 contagion in otolaryngology specialists.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Reducing the risks of endoscopic sinonasal surgery in the Covid-19 era.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Huw A S JonesUniversity Hospital Southampton NHSFT, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3329-2145
Rami J SalibUniversity Hospital Southampton NHSFT, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Philip G HarriesUniversity Hospital Southampton NHSFT, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Southampton General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe presence of high SARS-Cov-2 viral loads in the upper airway, including the potential for aerosolized transmission of viral particles, has generated significant concern amongst otolaryngologists worldwide, particularly those performing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). We evaluated a simple negative-pressure mask technique to reduce viral exposure.

methodsTwo models simulating respiratory droplets >5-10 μm and fine respiratory nuclei <5 μm using fluorescein dye and wood smoke, respectively, were utilized in a fixed cadaveric study in a controlled environment. Using ultraviolet light, fluorescein droplet spread was assessed during simulated ESS with powered microdebrider and powered drilling. Wood smoke ejection was used to evaluate fine particulate escape from a negative-pressure mask using digital subtraction image processing.

resultsThe use of a negative-pressure mask technique resulted in 98% reduction in the fine particulate aerosol simulation and eliminated larger respiratory droplet spread during simulated ESS, including during external drill activation.

conclusionsAs global ear, nose & throat (ENT) services resume routine elective operating, we demonstrate the potential use of a simple negative-pressure mask technique to reduce the risk of viral exposure for the operator and theatre staff during ESS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 131:956-960, 2021.

Indexed as

AerosolsAir PressureCadaverCOVID-19Disease Transmission, InfectiousEndoscopyEquipment DesignHumansInfection ControlInfectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalMasksOccupational ExposureParanasal Sinus DiseasesSARS-CoV-2Simulation TrainingVirionAerosolsCOVID-19 virusendoscopic sinus surgerymasknegative pressurerhinologysevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Identifiers

PMID32798323
PMCPMC7460946
OpenAlexW3049361882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.