Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32798237›Full record

ReviewTransfusion2020

Risk of transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 by transfusion: A literature review.

Jean-François Leblanc, Marc Germain, Gilles Delage, Sheila OʼBrien, Steven J Drews, Antoine Lewin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transfusion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of Levels of Nasal, Salivary, and Plasma Antibody to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 During Natural Infection and After Vaccination.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Transplanting COVID-19 positive donors: Expanding our experience to widen the donor pool.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Reinfection With SARS-CoV-2: Implications for Vaccines.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Review
  15. The Impact of COVID-19 on Blood Transfusion Services: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jean-François LeblancMedical Affairs and Innovation, Héma-Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Marc GermainMedical Affairs and Innovation, Héma-Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Gilles DelageMedical Affairs and Innovation, Héma-Québec, Saint-Laurent, Québec, Canada.
Sheila OʼBrienCanadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Steven J DrewsCanadian Blood Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2519-1109
Antoine LewinMedical Affairs and Innovation, Héma-Québec, Saint-Laurent, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1748-4198

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel human coronavirus responsible for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The emergence of this virus in Wuhan, China, at the end of 2019 and its worldwide spread to reach the pandemic stage has raised concerns about the possible risk that it might be transmissible by transfusion. This theoretical risk is further supported by reports of the detection of viral RNA in the blood of some infected individuals. To further address this risk, a thorough PubMed literature search was performed to systematically identify studies reporting data on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in blood or its components. Complementary searches were done to identify articles reporting data on the in vitro infectivity of blood components. At least 23 articles presenting data on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in blood, plasma, or serum were identified. Of these, three studies reported on blood donors with COVID-19 infection identified after donation, and no cases of transfusion transmission were identified. A few studies mentioned results of in vitro infectivity assays of blood components in permissive cell lines, none of which were able to detect infectious virus in blood or its components. Complementary searches have identified reports demonstrating that the correlation between the presence of viral RNA in a biologic sample and infectivity requires a minimal RNA load, which is rarely, if ever, observed in blood components. Overall, the available evidence suggests that the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by transfusion remains theoretical.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsBlood TransfusionPandemicsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell LineCOVID-19Endothelial CellsHumansRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Transfusion ReactionViral LoadViremiaVirus CultivationRNA, ViralbloodCOVID-19infectivityRNAemiaSARS-CoV-2Vero cell lines

Identifiers

PMID32798237
PMCPMC7461295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.