Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32798068›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of anaesthesia2020

Environmental sustainability in anaesthesia and critical care.

Forbes McGain, Jane Muret, Cathy Lawson, Jodi D Sherman

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of anaesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 150 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
18.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05511610 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Accuracy of the MAAS Method (Minimal-flow Auto-control Anesthesia System) for the Administration of Desflurane and Sevoflurane in the Anesthetic Maintenance Phase. Prospective and Paired Observational Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en SevillaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled28ConditionsAnesthesia, Sevoflurane, Desflurane, Low Flow AnesthesiaArmsSevoflurane uptake and supply, Washout phase, Desflurane uptake and supply, Final phase
NCT05609864 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Drug Wastage : Observational Study in the Operating Rooms of France

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur MerRan2023 to 2023Enrolled3,763ConditionsDrug UseArmsQuantification of injectable drugs wastage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 411 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Increasing the environmental sustainability of operating rooms in Canada: an evidence-informed guideline for policy.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. From carbon cost to climate care: Greening our intensive care units.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Forbes McGainWestern Health, Footscray, Australia. Electronic address: forbes.mcgain@wh.org.au.
Jane MuretFrench Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (SFAR), Institut Curie PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Cathy LawsonNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, UK.
Jodi D ShermanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Footscray Hospital · AUNewcastle upon Tyne Hospital · GBUniversité Paris Sciences et Lettres · FRYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detrimental health effects of climate change continue to increase. Although health systems respond to this disease burden, healthcare itself pollutes the atmosphere, land, and waterways. We surveyed the 'state of the art' environmental sustainability research in anaesthesia and critical care, addressing why it matters, what is known, and ideas for future work. Focus is placed upon the atmospheric chemistry of the anaesthetic gases, recent work clarifying their relative global warming potentials, and progress in waste anaesthetic gas treatment. Life cycle assessment (LCA; i.e. 'cradle to grave' analysis) is introduced as the definitive method used to compare and contrast ecological footprints of products, processes, and systems. The number of LCAs within medicine has gone from rare to an established body of knowledge in the past decade that can inform doctors of the relative ecological merits of different techniques. LCAs with practical outcomes are explored, such as the carbon footprint of reusable vs single-use anaesthetic devices (e.g. drug trays, laryngoscope blades, and handles), and the carbon footprint of treating an ICU patient with septic shock. Avoid, reduce, reuse, recycle, and reprocess are then explored. Moving beyond routine clinical care, the vital influences that the source of energy (renewables vs fossil fuels) and energy efficiency have in healthcare's ecological footprint are highlighted. Discussion of the integral roles of research translation, education, and advocacy in driving the perioperative and critical care environmental sustainability agenda completes this review.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaClimate ChangeCritical CareAnesthesiologyAnestheticsCarbonConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental PollutantsEnvironmental PollutionEquipment ReuseHumansRecyclingShock, SepticAnestheticsCarbonEnvironmental Pollutantsanaesthesiaanaesthetic gasesclimate changeenvironmentintensive carelife cycle assessmentsustainability

Identifiers

PMID32798068
PMCPMC7421303
OpenAlexW3048378906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.