Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32797411›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Mathematical Modeling of Protectant Transport in Tissues.

Ross M Warner, Adam Z Higgins

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ross M WarnerSchool of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Adam Z HigginsSchool of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, Corvallis, OR, USA. adam.higgins@oregonstate.edu.
Corvallis Environmental Center · US

Funding

Viable Banking of Human TissuesR01EB027203 · NIBIB · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI EROGLU, ALI · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass transfer of protectant chemicals is a fundamental aspect of cryopreservation and freeze-drying protocols. As such, mass transfer modeling is useful for design of preservation methods. Cell membrane transport modeling has been successfully used to guide design of preservation methods for isolated cells. For tissues, though, there are several mass transfer modeling challenges that arise from phenomena associated with cells being embedded in a tissue matrix. Both cells and the tissue matrix form a barrier to the free diffusion of water and protective chemicals. Notably, the extracellular space becomes important to model. The response of cells embedded in the tissue is dependent on the state of the extracellular space which varies both spatially and temporally. Transport in the extracellular space can also lead to changes in tissue size. In this chapter, we describe various mass transfer models that can be used to describe transport phenomena occurring during loading of tissues with protective molecules for cryopreservation applications. Assumptions and simplifications that limit the applicability of each of these models are discussed.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAnimalsBiological TransportCell MembraneCell Membrane PermeabilityComputer SimulationCryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsFreeze DryingHumansCryoprotective AgentsCryoprotectantDiffusionFixed chargesMass transferTissue

Identifiers

PMID32797411
PMCPMC8162897
OpenAlexW3049013716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.