Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32797369›Full record

ArticleBiological trace element research2021

Brazilian Genetic Diversity for Desirable and Undesirable Elements in the Wheat Grain.

Latóia Eduarda Maltzahn, Stefânia Garcia Zenker, Jennifer Luz Lopes, Rodrigo Mendes Pereira, Cezar Augusto Verdi, Vianei Rother, Carlos Busanello, Vívian Ebeling Viana, Bruno Lemos Batista, Antonio Costa de Oliveira and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biological trace element research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Latóia Eduarda MaltzahnFaculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Capão do Leão, Pelotas, RS, 96010-610, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1666-6432
Stefânia Garcia ZenkerFaculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Capão do Leão, Pelotas, RS, 96010-610, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8339-6594
Jennifer Luz LopesFaculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Capão do Leão, Pelotas, RS, 96010-610, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7869-1847
Rodrigo Mendes PereiraCentro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Campus Santo André, Santo André, SP, 09210-580, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1992-7140
Cezar Augusto VerdiFaculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Capão do Leão, Pelotas, RS, 96010-610, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2019-8988
Vianei RotherFaculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Capão do Leão, Pelotas, RS, 96010-610, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4233-700X
Carlos BusanelloFaculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Capão do Leão, Pelotas, RS, 96010-610, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5069-2525
Vívian Ebeling VianaFaculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Capão do Leão, Pelotas, RS, 96010-610, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8326-7549
Bruno Lemos BatistaCentro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Campus Santo André, Santo André, SP, 09210-580, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2216-9013
Antonio Costa de OliveiraFaculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Capão do Leão, Pelotas, RS, 96010-610, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-8071
Camila PegoraroFaculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Capão do Leão, Pelotas, RS, 96010-610, Brazil. cpegoraro.faem@ufpel.edu.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1376-9751
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversidade Federal do ABC · BR

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2016/10060-9 and 2014/05151-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micronutrient deficiency affects billions of people, especially in countries where the diet is low in diversity with inadequate consumption of fruits, vegetables, and animal-source foods, and higher consumption of staple food, i.e., cereals, that have low concentrations of micronutrients. Genetic biofortification is a strategy to mitigate this problem and ensure nutritional security. Wheat is a target of genetic biofortification since it contributes significantly to the caloric requirement. The biofortification process involves a screening related to the presence of genetic variability for grain mineral content. Also, the accumulation of toxic elements must be considered to ensure food safety, because if ingested above the allowed concentrations, it represents health risks. In this sense, this study aimed to quantify the micronutrients iron, zinc, copper, selenium, and manganese and toxic elements arsenic and cadmium in a Brazilian wheat panel grown in Southern Brazil. The presence of genetic variability for the accumulation of micronutrients in the grain was detected; however, we observed that only the copper and manganese accumulation meet the human daily requirements. Iron, zinc, and selenium were detected in insufficient concentration to meet the daily demand. Arsenic and cadmium accumulation were not detected in wheat grain. The wheat genotypes grown in Brazil displayed a similar profile to that found in other countries which may be due to common high-yield breeding goals and the narrowing of the genetic variability, observed worldwide. Thus, the wheat genetic biofortification success in Brazil depends on the introduction of foreign genotypes, landraces, and wild relatives.

Indexed as

Edible GrainTriticumAnimalsBrazilGenetic VariationHumansPlant BreedingGermplasmMineral elementToxic elementTriticum aestivum

Identifiers

PMID32797369
OpenAlexW3049025679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.