Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32797349›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2020

Bioactive compounds from marine invertebrates as potent anticancer drugs: the possible pharmacophores modulating cell death pathways.

Srimanta Patra, Prakash Priyadarshi Praharaj, Debasna Pritimanjari Panigrahi, Biswajit Panda, Chandra Sekhar Bhol, Kewal Kumar Mahapatra, Soumya Ranjan Mishra, Bishnu Prasad Behera, Mrutyunjay Jena, Gautam Sethi and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Methanol Extract ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. MicroRNAs as Modulators of Oral Tumorigenesis-A Focused Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Srimanta PatraCancer and Cell Death Laboratory, Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, 769008, India.
Prakash Priyadarshi PraharajCancer and Cell Death Laboratory, Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, 769008, India.
Debasna Pritimanjari PanigrahiCancer and Cell Death Laboratory, Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, 769008, India.
Biswajit PandaCollege of Basic Science & Humanities OUAT, Bhubaneswar, 751003, India.
Chandra Sekhar BholCancer and Cell Death Laboratory, Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, 769008, India.
Kewal Kumar MahapatraCancer and Cell Death Laboratory, Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, 769008, India.
Soumya Ranjan MishraCancer and Cell Death Laboratory, Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, 769008, India.
Bishnu Prasad BeheraCancer and Cell Death Laboratory, Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, 769008, India.
Mrutyunjay JenaPG Department of Botany, Berhampur University, Berhampur, 760007, India.
Gautam SethiDepartment of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117600, Singapore.
Shankargouda PatilDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, Division of Oral Pathology, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Samir Kumar PatraEpigenetics and Cancer Research Laboratory, Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, 769008, India.
Sujit Kumar BhutiaCancer and Cell Death Laboratory, Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, 769008, India. sujitb@nitrkl.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0962-3354
National Institute of Technology Rourkela · INBerhampur University · INJazan University · SANational University of Singapore · SGOdisha University of Agriculture and Technology · IN

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, India IF180167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine invertebrates are extremely diverse, largely productive, untapped oceanic resources with chemically unique bioactive lead compound contributing a wide range of screening for the discovery of anticancer compounds. The lead compounds have unfurled an extensive array of pharmacological properties owing to the presence of polyphenols, alkaloids, terpenoids and other secondary metabolites. The antioxidant, immunomodulatory and anti-tumor activities exhibited, are possibly regulated by the apoptosis induction, scavenging of ROS and modulation of cellular signaling pathways to defy the cellular deafness during carcinogenesis. Despite the enriched bioactive compounds, the marine invertebrates are largely unexplored as identification, screening, pre-clinical and clinical assessment of lead compounds and their synthetic analogs remain a major task to be solved. In the current review, we focus on the principle strategy and underlying mechanisms deployed by the bioactive anticancer compounds derived from marine invertebrates to combat cancer with special insight into the cell death mechanism.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsAnimalsAquatic OrganismsCell DeathHumansInvertebratesAntineoplastic AgentsAntioxidantsBioactive lead compoundsCancerMarine invertebratesReactive oxygen species (ROS)

Identifiers

PMID32797349
OpenAlexW3049341394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.