ArticleRheumatology international2021
Imaging digital arteries in systemic sclerosis by tomographic 3-dimensional ultrasound.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lasso-derived model for early prediction of systemic sclerosis based on vasculopathy assessment: a population-based cohort study.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- All for one: Collaboration between dermatologist, radiation oncologist and radiologist in the clinical management of "difficult to treat" non melanoma skin cancer.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective methods are needed to quantify digital artery disease in systemic sclerosis (SSc) for clinical trials of vascular therapies. Our primary aim was to examine feasibility of a novel tomographic three-dimensional-(3-D) ultrasound (tUS) with high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) or ultra-high-frequency ultrasound (UHFUS) to assess the digital arteries in patients with SSc compared to healthy controls. A secondary objective was to compare the total wall volume (TWV) as a measure of intimal/medial thickness. Eighteen patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SSc were studied by tUS HFUS (17.5 MHz, n = 10) or tUS UHFUS (48 and 70 MHz, n = 8) with equal numbers of healthy controls of similar age and gender. The majority of patients had limited cutaneous SSc and were representative of a spectrum of digital vasculopathy, with over half (n = 6 HFUS and n = 5 UHFUS) having previous digital ulceration. Over half were receiving oral vasodilatory therapy. TWV was measured in both digital arteries of the middle finger bilaterally. At least, two digital arteries could be identified at 17.5 MHz in all patients and healthy controls. Whereas, at least two digital arteries could be identified in relatively fewer patients compared to healthy controls using 48 MHz (n = 6 and 10) and especially 70 MHz (n = 4 and 10) UHFUS. The median difference in TWV between patients and healthy controls was -6.49 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.