Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32797247›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2021

Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Maristella F Saccomanno, Giuseppe Sircana, Valentina Cardona, Valeria Vismara, Alessandra Scaini, Andrea G Salvi, Stefano Galli, Giacomo Marchi, Giuseppe Milano

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. [Comparative study on effectiveness of clavicular hook plate fixation in treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation and distal clavicle fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Evolving concepts and consensus in challenging shoulder problems: a European perspective.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maristella F SaccomannoOrthopaedics Institute, Fondazione Policilinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. maristellasaccomanno@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7399-8762
Giuseppe SircanaOrthopaedics Institute, Fondazione Policilinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Valentina CardonaOrthopaedics Institute, Fondazione Policilinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Valeria VismaraOrthopaedics Institute, Fondazione Policilinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra ScainiUniversity of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Andrea G SalviUniversity of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Stefano GalliDepartment of Bone and Joint Surgery, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Giacomo MarchiDepartment of Bone and Joint Surgery, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Giuseppe MilanoUniversity of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo systematically review the outcomes of surgical treatments of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

methodsStudies were identified by electronic databases (Ovid, PubMed). All studies reporting functional and radiological outcomes of surgical treatments of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations were included. Following data were extracted: authors and year, study design, level of evidence, number of patients, age, classification of acromioclavicular joint dislocation, time to surgery, surgical technique, follow-up, clinical and imaging outcomes, complications, and failures. Descriptive statistics was used, when a data pooling was not possible. Comparable outcomes were pooled to generate summary outcomes reported as frequency-weighted values. Quality appraisal was assessed through the MINORS checklist.

resultsOne hundred and thirty-three studies were included for a total of 4473 shoulders. Mean age of participants was 36.9 years. Mean follow-up was 42.06 months. Arthroscopy showed better ASES (p < 0.0001) and lower VAS pain score (p = 0.0249) compared to an open approach. Biologic and synthetic reconstructions demonstrated better results over osteosynthesis techniques. Biologic techniques showed overall better Constant (p = 0.0001) and DASH (p = 0.0215) scores, while synthetic reconstruction showed better UCLA score (p = 0.0001). Among suture buttons, triple button showed overall better results in Constant (p = 0.0001) and VAS (p = 0.0001) scores, while better results in DASH score (p = 0.0003) were achieved by 2 double button techniques. Overall, the level of evidence was low.

conclusionBiological and synthetic reconstructions achieved better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis. Among suture buttons, the triple button showed better functional performance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsAcromioclavicular JointArthroscopyAthletic InjuriesHumansJoint DislocationsLigaments, ArticularPostoperative ComplicationsRadiographySuture TechniquesTime-to-TreatmentTreatment OutcomeAcromioclavicularAcromioclavicular ligamentBiologicCoracoclavicular ligamentDislocationInstabilityPlateReconstructionScrewsSyntheticTendon graft

Identifiers

PMID32797247
OpenAlexW3049618387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.