Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32797084›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Defining the nutritional input for genome-scale metabolic models: A roadmap.

Georgios Marinos, Christoph Kaleta, Silvio Waschina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Georgios MarinosResearch Group Medical Systems Biology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Kiel University, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6443-7696
Christoph KaletaResearch Group Medical Systems Biology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Kiel University, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8004-9514
Silvio WaschinaDivision of Nutriinformatics, Institute for Human Nutrition and Food Sciences, Kiel University, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6290-3593

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reconstruction and application of genome-scale metabolic network models is a central topic in the field of systems biology with numerous applications in biotechnology, ecology, and medicine. However, there is no agreed upon standard for the definition of the nutritional environment for these models. The objective of this article is to provide a guideline and a clear paradigm on how to translate nutritional information into an in-silico representation of the chemical environment. Step-by-step procedures explain how to characterise and categorise the nutritional input and to successfully apply it to constraint-based metabolic models. In parallel, we illustrate the proposed procedure with a case study of the growth of Escherichia coli in a complex nutritional medium and show that an accurate representation of the medium is crucial for physiological predictions. The proposed framework will assist researchers to expand their existing metabolic models of their microbial systems of interest with detailed representations of the nutritional environment, which allows more accurate and reproducible predictions of microbial metabolic processes.

Indexed as

GenomicsModels, BiologicalEscherichia coliNutritional Status

Identifiers

PMID32797084
PMCPMC7428157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.