Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32797080›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Multimodal principal component analysis to identify major features of white matter structure and links to reading.

Bryce L Geeraert, Maxime Chamberland, R Marc Lebel, Catherine Lebel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Personalized White Matter Bundle Segmentation for Early Childhood.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Multimodal MEG and Microstructure-MRI Investigations of the Human Hippocampal Scene Network.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A role for the fornix in temporal sequence memory.The European journal of neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bryce L GeeraertBiomedical Engineering Graduate Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1388-1014
Maxime ChamberlandSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff, United Kingdom.
R Marc LebelAlberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Catherine LebelAlberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0344-4032
University of Calgary · CACardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of white matter in reading has been established by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), but DTI cannot identify specific microstructural features driving these relationships. Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI), inhomogeneous magnetization transfer (ihMT) and multicomponent driven equilibrium single-pulse observation of T1/T2 (mcDESPOT) can be used to link more specific aspects of white matter microstructure and reading due to their sensitivity to axonal packing and fiber coherence (NODDI) and myelin (ihMT and mcDESPOT). We applied principal component analysis (PCA) to combine DTI, NODDI, ihMT and mcDESPOT measures (10 in total), identify major features of white matter structure, and link these features to both reading and age. Analysis was performed for nine reading-related tracts in 46 neurotypical 6-16 year olds. We identified three principal components (PCs) which explained 79.5% of variance in our dataset. PC1 probed tissue complexity, PC2 described myelin and axonal packing, while PC3 was related to axonal diameter. Mixed effects regression models did not identify any significant relationships between principal components and reading skill. Bayes factor analysis revealed that the absence of relationships was not due to low power. Increasing PC1 in the left arcuate fasciculus with age suggest increases in tissue complexity, while increases of PC2 in the bilateral arcuate, inferior longitudinal, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculi, and splenium suggest increases in myelin and axonal packing with age. Multimodal white matter imaging and PCA provide microstructurally informative, powerful principal components which can be used by future studies of development and cognition. Our findings suggest major features of white matter undergo development during childhood and adolescence, but changes are not linked to reading during this period in our typically-developing sample.

Indexed as

ReadingAdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentAxonsBayes TheoremChildChild DevelopmentDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHealthy VolunteersHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleModels, AnatomicModels, Neurological

Identifiers

PMID32797080
PMCPMC7428127
OpenAlexW3049013229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.