ArticlePloS one2020
Quantifying synergy in the bioassay-guided fractionation of natural product extracts.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Antigonococcal Activity and Cytotoxicity Screening of Three Ziziphus Species Indigenous to South Africa.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
- Review on bioactive compounds of medicinal plants with antiviral properties against Newcastle disease virus (NDV).Archives of virology · 2026Review
- Assessing biological activities of polyphenols in the context of 4R - challenges of a ubiquitous compound class with complex modes of action.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Computational analysis of therapeutic potential for simplifiedFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Computational analysis of therapeutic potential for simplified Piper. spp- derived medicinal mixtures in anxiety, sleep, pain and seizure.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Research Progress on Natural Products That Regulate miRNAs in the Treatment of Osteosarcoma.Biology · 2025Review
- ΔCannabis and cannabinoid research · 2023Article
- Interaction Metabolomics to Discover Synergists in Natural Product Mixtures.Journal of natural products · 2023Article
- Aqueous Extract ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Ethnobotany and the Role of Plant Natural Products in Antibiotic Drug Discovery.Chemical reviews · 2021Review
- Castaneroxy A From the Leaves ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mixtures of drugs often have greater therapeutic value than any of their constituent drugs alone, and such combination therapies are widely used to treat diseases such as cancer, malaria, and viral infections. However, developing useful drug mixtures is challenging due to complex interactions between drugs. Natural substances can be fruitful sources of useful drug mixtures because secondary metabolites produced by living organisms do not often act in isolation in vivo. In order to facilitate the study of interactions within natural substances, a new analytical method to quantify interactions using data generated in the process of bioassay-guided fractionation is presented here: the extract fractional inhibitory concentration index (EFICI). The EFICI method uses the framework of Loewe additivity to calculate fractional inhibitory concentration values by which interactions can be determined for any combination of fractions that make up a parent extract. The EFICI method was applied to data on the bioassay-guided fractionation of Lechea mucronata and Schinus terebinthifolia for growth inhibition of the pathogenic bacterium Acinetobacter baumannii. The L. mucronata extract contained synergistic interactions (EFICI = 0.4181) and the S. terebinthifolia extract was non-interactive overall (EFICI = 0.9129). Quantifying interactions in the bioassay-guided fractionation of natural substances does not require additional experiments and can be useful to guide the experimental process and to support the development of standardized extracts as botanical drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.