Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32797044›Full record

SynthesisPLoS computational biology2020

Machine Learning based histology phenotyping to investigate the epidemiologic and genetic basis of adipocyte morphology and cardiometabolic traits.

Craig A Glastonbury, Sara L Pulit, Julius Honecker, Jenny C Censin, Samantha Laber, Hanieh Yaghootkar, Nilufer Rahmioglu, Emilie Pastel, Katerina Kos, Andrew Pitt and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Loss ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Relevance of body composition in phenotyping the obesities.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Craig A GlastonburyBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5542-2225
Sara L PulitBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Julius HoneckerElse Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1592-7023
Jenny C CensinBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6625-6074
Samantha LaberBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Hanieh YaghootkarGenetics of Complex Traits, University of Exeter Medical School, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9672-9477
Nilufer RahmiogluWellcome Centre for Human Genetics (WCHG), Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5169-8571
Emilie PastelGenetics of Complex Traits, University of Exeter Medical School, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Katerina KosGenetics of Complex Traits, University of Exeter Medical School, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3761-2249
Andrew PittNIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter and Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0721-2466
Michelle HudsonNIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter and Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0623-1873
Christoffer NellåkerBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2887-2068
Nicola L BeerNovo Nordisk Research Centre Oxford (NNRCO), Oxford, United Kingdom.
Hans HaunerElse Kröner-Fresenius-Center for Nutritional Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1682-5088
Christian M BeckerEndometriosis CaRe Centre Oxford, Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9870-9581
Krina T ZondervanWellcome Centre for Human Genetics (WCHG), Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0275-9905
Timothy M FraylingGenetics of Complex Traits, University of Exeter Medical School, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8362-2603
Melina ClaussnitzerBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge Massachusetts, United States of America.
Cecilia M LindgrenBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4903-9374
University of Exeter · GBBroad Institute · USCentre for Human Genetics · GBOpen Data Institute · GBFresenius (Germany) · DENovo Nordisk (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T002239/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic studies have recently highlighted the importance of fat distribution, as well as overall adiposity, in the pathogenesis of obesity-associated diseases. Using a large study (n = 1,288) from 4 independent cohorts, we aimed to investigate the relationship between mean adipocyte area and obesity-related traits, and identify genetic factors associated with adipocyte cell size. To perform the first large-scale study of automatic adipocyte phenotyping using both histological and genetic data, we developed a deep learning-based method, the Adipocyte U-Net, to rapidly derive mean adipocyte area estimates from histology images. We validate our method using three state-of-the-art approaches; CellProfiler, Adiposoft and floating adipocytes fractions, all run blindly on two external cohorts. We observe high concordance between our method and the state-of-the-art approaches (Adipocyte U-net vs. CellProfiler: R2visceral = 0.94, P < 2.2 × 10-16, R2subcutaneous = 0.91, P < 2.2 × 10-16), and faster run times (10,000 images: 6mins vs 3.5hrs). We applied the Adipocyte U-Net to 4 cohorts with histology, genetic, and phenotypic data (total N = 820). After meta-analysis, we found that mean adipocyte area positively correlated with body mass index (BMI) (Psubq = 8.13 × 10-69, βsubq = 0.45; Pvisc = 2.5 × 10-55, βvisc = 0.49; average R2 across cohorts = 0.49) and that adipocytes in subcutaneous depots are larger than their visceral counterparts (Pmeta = 9.8 × 10-7). Lastly, we performed the largest GWAS and subsequent meta-analysis of mean adipocyte area and intra-individual adipocyte variation (N = 820). Despite having twice the number of samples than any similar study, we found no genome-wide significant associations, suggesting that larger sample sizes and a homogenous collection of adipose tissue are likely needed to identify robust genetic associations.

Indexed as

AdipocytesMachine LearningObesityAdipose TissueAdultBody Mass IndexCell SizeComputational BiologyFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID32797044
PMCPMC7449405
OpenAlexW3049245812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.