Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32796858›Full record

ArticleScientific data2020

Benchmark maps of 33 years of secondary forest age for Brazil.

Celso H L Silva Junior, Viola H A Heinrich, Ana T G Freire, Igor S Broggio, Thais M Rosan, Juan Doblas, Liana O Anderson, Guillaume X Rousseau, Yosio E Shimabukuro, Carlos A Silva and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Collective property rights lead to secondary forest growth in the Brazilian Amazon.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Celso H L Silva Junior *Tropical Ecosystems and Environmental Sciences lab - TREES, São José dos Campos, Brazil. celsohlsj@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1052-5551
Viola H A Heinrich *University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Ana T G FreirePrograma de Pós-graduação em Biodiversidade e Conservação, Universidade Federal do Maranhão (UFMA), São Luís, Brazil.
Igor S BroggioTropical Ecosystems and Environmental Sciences lab - TREES, São José dos Campos, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9045-9135
Thais M RosanUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Juan DoblasInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), São José dos Campos, Brazil.
Liana O AndersonTropical Ecosystems and Environmental Sciences lab - TREES, São José dos Campos, Brazil.
Guillaume X RousseauPrograma de Pós-graduação em Agroecologia, Universidade Estadual do Maranhão (UEMA), São Luís, Brazil.
Yosio E ShimabukuroInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), São José dos Campos, Brazil.
Carlos A SilvaUniversity of Maryland, College Park, United States of America.
Joanna I HouseUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-3960
Luiz E O C AragãoTropical Ecosystems and Environmental Sciences lab - TREES, São José dos Campos, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Brazilian Federal Agency for the Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education) 001Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (Instituto Interamericano para la Investigación del Cambio Global) SGP-HW 016Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) 305054/2016-3RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/L002434/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The restoration and reforestation of 12 million hectares of forests by 2030 are amongst the leading mitigation strategies for reducing carbon emissions within the Brazilian Nationally Determined Contribution targets assumed under the Paris Agreement. Understanding the dynamics of forest cover, which steeply decreased between 1985 and 2018 throughout Brazil, is essential for estimating the global carbon balance and quantifying the provision of ecosystem services. To know the long-term increment, extent, and age of secondary forests is crucial; however, these variables are yet poorly quantified. Here we developed a 30-m spatial resolution dataset of the annual increment, extent, and age of secondary forests for Brazil over the 1986-2018 period. Land-use and land-cover maps from MapBiomas Project (Collection 4.1) were used as input data for our algorithm, implemented in the Google Earth Engine platform. This dataset provides critical spatially explicit information for supporting carbon emissions reduction, biodiversity, and restoration policies, enabling environmental science applications, territorial planning, and subsidizing environmental law enforcement.

Identifiers

PMID32796858
PMCPMC7427968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.