Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32796655›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2020

Reduced Attentional Control in Older Adults Leads to Deficits in Flexible Prioritization of Visual Working Memory.

Sarah E Henderson, Holly A Lockhart, Emily E Davis, Stephen M Emrich, Karen L Campbell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah E HendersonDepartment of Psychology, Brock University, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.
Holly A LockhartDepartment of Psychology, Brock University, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.
Emily E DavisDepartment of Psychology, Brock University, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.
Stephen M EmrichDepartment of Psychology, Brock University, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8768-1333
Karen L CampbellDepartment of Psychology, Brock University, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0015-6307

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 2019-435945Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2017-03804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual working memory (VWM) resources have been shown to be flexibly distributed according to item priority. This flexible allocation of resources may depend on attentional control, an executive function known to decline with age. In this study, we sought to determine how age differences in attentional control affect VWM performance when attention is flexibly allocated amongst targets of varying priority. Participants performed a delayed-recall task wherein item priority was varied. Error was modelled using a three-component mixture model to probe different aspects of performance (precision, guess-rate, and non-target errors). The flexible resource model offered a good fit to the data from both age groups, but older adults showed consistently lower precision and higher guess rates. Importantly, when demands on flexible resource allocation were highest, older adults showed more non-target errors, often swapping in the item that had a higher priority at encoding. Taken together, these results suggest that the ability to flexibly allocate attention in VWM is largely maintained with age, but older adults are less precise overall and sometimes swap in salient, but no longer relevant, items possibly due to their lessened ability to inhibit previously attended information.

Indexed as

agingattentional controlvisual working memoryworking memory

Identifiers

PMID32796655
PMCPMC7466080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.