Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32796106›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

The

Wonmuk Hwang, Robert J Mallis, Matthew J Lang, Ellis L Reinherz

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Atomistic TCR-ligand interactions instruct memory T-cell differentiation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Mechanical force matters in early T cell activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wonmuk HwangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843; hwm@tamu.edu ellis_reinherz@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7514-3186
Robert J MallisDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.ORCID 0000-0002-2087-9468
Matthew J LangDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235.ORCID 0000-0002-8198-144X
Ellis L ReinherzLaboratory of Immunobiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115; hwm@tamu.edu ellis_reinherz@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1048-5526
Harvard University · USKorea Institute for Advanced Study · KRVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Protein Production CoreP01AI143565 · NIAID · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI ELLIS L REINHERZ · 2020 to 2026
$19.9M
Understanding the structural basis of T cell receptor (TCR) and preTCR mechanosensing: single molecule, NMR and molecular dynamics studiesR01AI136301 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANG, MATTHEW J. · 2018 to 2022
$3.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI143565NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI136301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each [Formula: see text]T cell receptor (TCR) functions as a mechanosensor. The TCR is comprised of a clonotypic TCR[Formula: see text] ligand-binding heterodimer and the noncovalently associated CD3 signaling subunits. When bound by ligand, an antigenic peptide arrayed by a major histocompatibility complex molecule (pMHC), the TCR[Formula: see text] has a longer bond lifetime under piconewton-level loads. The atomistic mechanism of this "catch bond" behavior is unknown. Here, we perform molecular dynamics simulation of a TCR[Formula: see text]-pMHC complex and its variants under physiologic loads to identify this mechanism and any attendant TCR[Formula: see text] domain allostery. The TCR[Formula: see text]-pMHC interface is dynamically maintained by contacts with a spectrum of occupancies, introducing a level of control via relative motion between Vα and Vβ variable domains containing the pMHC-binding complementarity-determining region (CDR) loops. Without adequate load, the interfacial contacts are unstable, whereas applying sufficient load suppresses Vα-Vβ motion, stabilizing the interface. A second level of control is exerted by Cα and Cβ constant domains, especially Cβ and its protruding FG-loop, that create mismatching interfaces among the four TCR[Formula: see text] domains and with a pMHC ligand. Applied load enhances fit through deformation of the TCR[Formula: see text] molecule. Thus, the catch bond involves the entire TCR[Formula: see text] conformation, interdomain motion, and interfacial contact dynamics, collectively. This multilayered architecture of the machinery fosters fine-tuning of cellular response to load and pMHC recognition. Since the germline-derived TCR[Formula: see text] ectodomain is structurally conserved, the proposed mechanism can be universally adopted to operate under load during immune surveillance by diverse [Formula: see text]TCRs constituting the T cell repertoire.

Indexed as

Major Histocompatibility ComplexMolecular Dynamics SimulationHumansLigandsMechanotransduction, CellularReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaT-LymphocytesLigandsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betacatch bonddynamic allosterymechanoimmunologymolecular dynamicsT cell receptor

Identifiers

PMID32796106
PMCPMC7474670
OpenAlexW3049123519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.