Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32796019›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2020

Exploratory cost-effectiveness model of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) compared with CT-guided biopsy (TTNA) for diagnosis of malignant indeterminate peripheral pulmonary nodules.

William Rickets, Kelvin Kar Wing Lau, Vicki Pollit, Stuart Mealing, Catherine Leonard, Philip Mallender, Nilanjan Chaudhuri, Pallav L Shah, Umamamaheswar Babu Naidu

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in Diagnostic Bronchoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. SuccessfulCase reports in oncology
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

William RicketsBarts Thorax Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0475-0744
Kelvin Kar Wing LauBarts Thorax Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, London, UK.
Vicki PollitYork Health Economics Consortium, Heslington, North Yorkshire, UK.
Stuart MealingYork Health Economics Consortium, Heslington, North Yorkshire, UK stuart.mealing@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2564-1440
Catherine LeonardMedtronic United Kingdom, Watford, Hertfordshire, UK.
Philip MallenderMedtronic United Kingdom, Watford, Hertfordshire, UK.
Nilanjan ChaudhuriLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Pallav L ShahNIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK.
Umamamaheswar Babu NaiduQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Barts Health NHS Trust · GBLeeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBMedtronic (United Kingdom) · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBRoyal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLung cancer is accountable for 35 000 deaths annually, and prognosis is improved when the cancer is diagnosed early. CT-guided biopsy (transthoracic needle aspiration, TTNA) and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) can be used to investigate indeterminate pulmonary nodules if the patient is unfit for surgery. However, there is a paucity of clinical and health economic evidence that directly compares ENB with TTNA in this population group. This cost-effectiveness study aimed to explore potential scenarios whereby ENB may be considered cost-effective when compared with TTNA.

methodsA cohort decision analytic model was developed using a UK National Health Service perspective. ENB was assumed to have equal sensitivity to TTNA at 82%. Lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain were calculated to estimate the net monetary benefit at a £20 000 per QALY threshold. Sensitivity analyses were used to explore scenarios where ENB could be considered a cost-effective intervention.

resultsUnder the assumption that ENB has equal efficacy to TTNA, ENB was found to be dominant (less costly and more effective) when compared with TTNA, due to having a reduced risk and cost of adverse events. This conclusion was most sensitive to changes in the cost of intervention, estimates of effectiveness and adverse event rates. DISCUSSION: ENB is expected to be cost-effective when the likelihood of an accurate diagnosis is equal to (or better than) TTNA, which may occur in certain subgroups of patients in whom TTNA is unlikely to accurately diagnose malignancy or when an experienced practitioner achieves a high accuracy with ENB.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisElectromagnetic PhenomenaBiopsy, Fine-NeedleBronchoscopyFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyLung NeoplasmsMaleMultiple Pulmonary NodulesState MedicineTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnited Kingdombronchoscopylung cancer

Identifiers

PMID32796019
PMCPMC7430329
OpenAlexW3048660776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.