Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32796009›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes care2020

Benchmarking the Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions Delaying Diabetes: A Simulation Study Based on NAVIGATOR Data.

Jose Leal, Shelby D Reed, Rishi Patel, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Yanhong Li, Kevin A Schulman, Robert M Califf, Rury R Holman, Alastair M Gray

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jose LealHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K. jose.leal@dph.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7654-4464
Shelby D ReedDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-7870-6730
Rishi PatelHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.
Oliver Rivero-AriasNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.
Yanhong LiDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Kevin A SchulmanStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Robert M CaliffDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Rury R HolmanDiabetes Trials Unit, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-1256-874X
Alastair M GrayHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate using the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model Version 2 (UKPDS-OM2) the impact of delaying type 2 diabetes onset on costs and quality-adjusted life expectancy using trial participants who developed diabetes in the NAVIGATOR (Nateglinide And Valsartan in Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research) study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe simulated the impact of delaying diabetes onset by 1-9 years, utilizing data from the 3,058 of 9,306 NAVIGATOR trial participants who developed type 2 diabetes. Costs and utility weights associated with diabetes and diabetes-related complications were obtained for the U.S. and U.K. settings, with costs expressed in 2017 values. We estimated discounted lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with 95% CIs.

resultsGains in QALYs increased from 0.02 (U.S. setting, 95% CI 0.01, 0.03) to 0.15 (U.S. setting, 95% CI 0.10, 0.21) as the imposed time to diabetes onset was increased from 1 to 9 years, respectively. Savings in complication costs increased from $1,388 (95% CI $1,092, $1,669) for a 1-year delay to $8,437 (95% CI $6,611, $10,197) for a delay of 9 years. Interventions costing up to $567-$2,680 and £201-£947 per year would be cost-effective at $100,000 per QALY and £20,000 per QALY thresholds in the U.S. and U.K., respectively, as the modeled delay in diabetes onset was increased from 1 to 9 years.

conclusionsSimulating a hypothetical diabetes-delaying intervention provides guidance concerning the maximum cost and minimum delay in diabetes onset needed to be cost-effective. These results can inform the ongoing debate about diabetes prevention strategies and the design of future intervention studies.

Indexed as

Primary PreventionAdultAgedAge of OnsetBenchmarkingCardiometabolic Risk FactorsCardiovascular DiseasesChemopreventionComputer SimulationCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Double-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedValsartan

Identifiers

PMID32796009
PMCPMC7510029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.