Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32795431›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2021

Sector Retinitis Pigmentosa: Extending the Molecular Genetics Basis and Elucidating the Natural History.

Michalis Georgiou, Parampal S Grewal, Akshay Narayan, Muath Alser, Naser Ali, Kaoru Fujinami, Andrew R Webster, Michel Michaelides

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Single-Cell Transcriptomics onBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Retinitis Pigmentosa: Current Clinical Management and Emerging Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michalis GeorgiouInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Parampal S GrewalUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Akshay NarayanInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Muath AlserInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Naser AliUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kaoru FujinamiInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Laboratory of Visual Physiology, Division of Vision Research, National Institute of Sensory Organs, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Andrew R WebsterInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michel MichaelidesInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: michel.michaelides@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBNational Hospital Organization · JP

Funding

Wellcome Trust 099173/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the genetic background of sector retinitis pigmentosa (RP) natural history to better inform patient counseling.

designRetrospective case series.

methodsReview of clinical notes, retinal imaging including color fundus photography (CFP), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), optical coherence tomography (OCT), electrophysiological assessment (ERG), and molecular genetic testing were performed in patients with sector RP from a single tertiary referral center. Main outcomes measured were demographic data, signs and symptoms, visual acuity, molecular genetics; and ERG, FAF, and OCT findings.

resultsTwenty-six molecularly confirmed patients from 23 different families were identified harboring likely disease-causing variants in 9 genes. The modes of inheritance were autosomal recessive (AR, n=6: USH1C, n=2; MYO7A, n=2; CDH3, n=1; EYS, n=1), X-linked (XL, n=4: PRPS1, n=1; RPGR, n=3), and autosomal dominant (AD, n=16: IMPDH1, n=3; RP1, n=3; RHO, n=10), with a mean age of disease onset of 38.5, 30.5, and 39.0 years old, respectively. Five of these genes have not previously been reported to cause sector RP (PRPS1, MYO7A, EYS, IMPDH1, and RP1). Inferior and nasal predilection was common across the different genotypes, and patients tended to maintain good central vision. Progression on serial FAF was observed in RPGR, MYO7A, CDH23, EYS, IMPDH1, RP1, and RHO-associated sector RP.

conclusionsThe genotypic spectrum of the disease is broader than previously reported. The longitudinal data provided will help to make accurate patient prognoses and counseling as well as inform patients' potential participation in the increasing numbers of trials of novel therapeutics and access to future treatments.

Indexed as

Molecular BiologyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDNA Mutational AnalysisElectroretinographyEye ProteinsFemaleFluorescein AngiographyGenetic Association StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPedigreeRetinaEye Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32795431
PMCPMC7772805
OpenAlexW3048699379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.