Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32795375›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2020

Delivering 'tiny targets' in a remote region of southern Chad: a cost analysis of tsetse control in the Mandoul sleeping sickness focus.

Jean-Baptiste Rayaisse, Fabrice Courtin, Mahamat Hisséne Mahamat, Mahamat Chérif, Wilfrid Yoni, Nadmba M O Gadjibet, Mallaye Peka, Philippe Solano, Steve J Torr, Alexandra P M Shaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jean-Baptiste RayaisseCentre International de Recherche-Développement sur l'Elevage en zone Subhumide (CIRDES), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Fabrice CourtinInstitut Pierre Richet (IPR), Bouaké, Côte d'Ivoire.
Mahamat Hisséne MahamatInstitut de Recherche en Elevage pour le Développement (IRED), N'Djaména, Chad.
Mahamat ChérifInstitut de Recherche en Elevage pour le Développement (IRED), N'Djaména, Chad.
Wilfrid YoniCentre International de Recherche-Développement sur l'Elevage en zone Subhumide (CIRDES), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Nadmba M O GadjibetInstitut de Recherche en Elevage pour le Développement (IRED), N'Djaména, Chad.
Mallaye PekaProgramme National de Lutte contre la Trypanosomiase Humaine Africaine (PNLTHA), N'Djaména, Chad.
Philippe SolanoInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Unité mixte de recherche, (UMR) 177 Intertryp IRD-Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement (CIRAD), Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Steve J TorrLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.
Alexandra P M ShawInfection Medicine, Deanery of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. alex@apconsultants.co.uk.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1104516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 2012, the World Health Organisation and the countries affected by the Gambian form of human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) have been committed to eliminating the disease, primarily through active case-finding and treatment. To interrupt transmission of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense and move more rapidly towards elimination, it was decided to add vector control using 'tiny targets'. Chad's Mandoul HAT focus extends over 840 km

methodsA protocol was developed for the routine collection of tsetse control costs during all field missions. This was implemented throughout 2015 and 2016, and combined with the recorded costs of the preliminary survey and sensitisation activities. The objective was to calculate the full costs at local prices in Chad. Costs were adjusted to remove research components and to ensure that items outside the project budget lines were included, such as administrative overheads and a share of staff salaries.

resultsTargets were deployed at about 60 per linear km of riverine tsetse habitat. The average annual cost of the operation was USD 56,113, working out at USD 66.8 per km

conclusionsThis study has confirmed that tiny targets provide a consistently low cost option for controlling tsetse in gambiense HAT foci. Although the study area is remote with a tsetse habitat characterised by wide river marshes, the costs were similar to those of tiny target work in Uganda, with some differences, in particular a higher cost per target delivered. As was the case in Uganda, the cost was between a quarter and a third that of historical target operations using full size targets or traps.

Indexed as

Costs and Cost AnalysisInsect ControlTrypanosomiasis, AfricanTsetse FliesAnimalsCattleChadHumansInsecticidesInsect VectorsInsecticidesChadCostHuman African trypanosomiasisMandoulTiny targetsTsetse control

Identifiers

PMID32795375
PMCPMC7427721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.