Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32795366›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2020

Perceptions of contraception services among recipients of a combination HIV-prevention interventions for adolescent girls and young women in South Africa: a qualitative study.

Kim Jonas, Zoe Duby, Kealeboga Maruping, Janan Dietrich, Nevilene Slingers, Jane Harries, Caroline Kuo, Catherine Mathews

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Provider perspectives on adolescent access to contraception in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kim JonasHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa. kim.jonas@mrc.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4469-6674
Zoe DubyHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kealeboga MarupingHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Janan DietrichPerinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Nevilene SlingersOffice of AIDS and TB, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jane HarriesWomen's Health Research Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Caroline KuoDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Catherine MathewsHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZABrown University · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

CDC HHS 1U2GGH001150CGH CDC HHS U2G GH001150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) have high rates of unintended pregnancies and are at higher risk for HIV infection compared to older women of reproductive age. Using a socio-ecological model approach, this research investigated perceptions of contraception services among AGYW who had been recipients of a combination HIV-prevention intervention, to better understand factors affecting their access to and use of contraception services.

methodQualitative methods used in this study included focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) with 185 AGYW aged 15-24 years living in five of the ten intervention districts. All interviews and FGDs were audio-recorded and data were analyzed thematically using Nvivo 12 software with manual identification of themes and labelling of raw data.

resultsThe findings reveal that many AGYW, especially those in the younger age group 15-19 years, experience difficulties in accessing contraception services, mainly at the interpersonal and health service levels. Lack of support for the use of contraceptives from parents/caregivers as well as from sexual partners were key barriers at the interpersonal level; while providers' negative attitude was the main barrier at the health service level. The majority of school-going AGYW felt that bringing contraception services and other sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services on to the school premises would legitimize their use in the eyes of parents and help to overcome barriers related to parental support and acceptance, as well as overcome some of the health service and structural level barriers. However, views among school-going AGYW about school-based provision of contraception services were mixed, clouded with concerns relating to confidentiality.

conclusionInterventions to improve parental/caregiver and sexual partner support for the use of contraception services by AGYW, as well as efforts to expand the provision of contraception services on the school premises are urgently needed. Future interventions should incorporate multi-level approaches to address structural and contextual barriers to access and use of contraception services to gain maximum effect.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAttitude of Health PersonnelContraceptionContraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicPerceptionPregnancyPregnancy in AdolescenceQualitative ResearchSexual BehaviorAccessAdolescent girlsContraception servicesContraceptivesContraceptive useSexual and reproductive healthYoung women

Identifiers

PMID32795366
PMCPMC7427945
OpenAlexW3049324507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.