Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32795282›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Acceptability of telephone-based pain coping skills training among African Americans with osteoarthritis enrolled in a randomized controlled trial: a mixed methods analysis.

Chamara J Dharmasri, Ida Griesemer, Liubov Arbeeva, Lisa C Campbell, Crystal W Cené, Francis J Keefe, Eugene Z Oddone, Tamara J Somers, Kelli D Allen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02560922 (Pain Coping Skills Training for African Americans With Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02560922 nacompletednot on this map

Pain Coping Skills Training for African Americans With Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2016 to 2018Enrolled248ConditionsOsteoarthritisArmsPain Coping Skills Training (CST)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chamara J DharmasriDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Ida GriesemerDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Liubov ArbeevaDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lisa C CampbellDepartment of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Crystal W CenéDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Francis J KeefeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Eugene Z OddoneCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
Tamara J SomersDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Kelli D AllenDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. kdallen@email.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3886-0677
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · USDurham VA Health Care System · USEast Carolina University · US

Funding

UNC-CH Summer Research Training in Aging for Medical StudentsT35AG038047 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JAN BUSBY-WHITEHEAD · 2010 to 2026
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS T35 AG038047Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (US) AD-1408-19519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) disproportionately impacts African Americans compared to Caucasians, including greater pain severity. The Pain Coping Skills Training for African Americans with Osteoarthritis (STAART) study examined a culturally enhanced Pain Coping Skills Training (CST) program among African Americans with OA. This mixed methods study evaluated the acceptability of the Pain CST program among STAART participants.

methodsSTAART was a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of an 11-session, telephone-based pain CST program, compared to a usual care control group. Participants were from the University of North Carolina and Durham Veterans Affairs Healthcare Systems. The present analyses included 93 participants in the CST group who completed a questionnaire about experiences with the program. Descriptive statistics of the questionnaire responses were calculated using SAS software. Thematic analysis was applied to open-response data using Dedoose software.

resultsParticipants' mean rating of overall helpfulness of the pain CST program for managing arthritis symptoms was 8.0 (SD = 2.2) on a scale of 0-10. A majority of participants reported the program made a positive difference in their experience with arthritis (83.1%). Mean ratings of helpfulness of the specific skills ranged from 7.7 to 8.8 (all scales 0-10). Qualitative analysis of the open-response data identified four prominent themes: Improved Pain Coping, Mood and Emotional Benefits, Improved Physical Functioning, and experiences related to Intervention Delivery.

conclusionsThe high ratings of helpfulness demonstrate acceptability of this culturally enhanced pain CST program by African Americans with OA. Increasing access to cognitive-behavioral therapy-based programs may be a promising strategy to address racial disparities in OA-related pain and associated outcomes.

trial registrationNCT02560922 , registered September 25, 2015.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanOsteoarthritisAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansPainTelephoneAcceptabilityCopingDisparitiesMixed methodsOsteoarthritisPain

Identifiers

PMID32795282
PMCPMC7427940
OpenAlexW3049728066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.