Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32795270›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2020

Developing and validating a questionnaire for mortality follow-back studies on end-of-life care and decision-making in a resource-poor Caribbean country.

Nicholas Jennings, Kenneth Chambaere, Cheryl Cox Macpherson, Karen L Cox, Luc Deliens, Joachim Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas JenningsEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium. nicholas.jennings@vub.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0045-5243
Kenneth ChambaereEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Cheryl Cox MacphersonBioethics Division, St. George's University School of Medicine and Windward Islands Research and Education Foundation, St. George's, Grenada.
Karen L CoxPalliative Care Unit, Caura Hospital, North Central Regional Health Authority, Caura, Trinidad and Tobago.
Luc DeliensEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Joachim CohenEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

The Research Council of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel: Strategic Research Programs SRP4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative and end-of-life care development is hindered by a lack of information about the circumstances surrounding dying in developing and resource-poor countries. Our aims were to develop and obtain face and content validity for a self-administered questionnaire on end-of-life care provision and medical decision-making for use in population-based surveys.

methodsModelled on validated questionnaires from research in developed countries, our questionnaire was adapted to the cultural sensitivity and medico-legal context of Trinidad and Tobago. Two sets of semi-structured face-to-face cognitive interviews were done with a sample of physicians, sampling was purposive. Phase 1 assessed interpretation of the questions, terminology and content of the questionnaire. Phase 2 was tested on a heterogeneous group of physicians to identify and fix problematic questions or recurring issues. Adjustments were made incrementally and re-tested in successive interviews.

resultsEighteen physicians were interviewed nationwide. Adaptations to questionnaires used in developed countries included: addition of a definition of palliative care, change of sensitive words like expedited to influenced, adjustments to question formulations, follow-up questions and answer options on medications used were added, the sequence, title and layout were changed and instructions for completion were included at the beginning of the questionnaire.

conclusionA new instrument for assessing and documenting end-of-life care and circumstances of dying in a small, resource-poor Caribbean country was developed and validated, and can be readily used as a mortality follow-back instrument. Our methods and procedures of development can be applied as a guide for similar studies in other small developing countries.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultCaribbean RegionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth ResourcesHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminal CareCaribbean regionDeveloping countryMethodologyQuestionnaire designTerminal care

Identifiers

PMID32795270
PMCPMC7427774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.