Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32795202›Full record

ArticleApplied neuropsychology. Adult

Assessing numerical reasoning provides insight into financial literacy.

Preeti Sunderaraman, Megan Barker, Silvia Chapman, Stephanie Cosentino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied neuropsychology. Adult. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Preeti SunderaramanColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Megan BarkerColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Silvia ChapmanColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Stephanie CosentinoColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001873 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2016 to 2025
$99.0M
Research Education CoreP30AG066462 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ADAM M BRICKMAN · 2020 to 2026
$30.1M
Factors Influencing Financial Capacity and Awareness of Capacity in Cognitive AgingF32AG053035 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUNDERARAMAN, PREETI · 2016 to 2019
$150k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001873NIA NIH HHS F32 AG053035NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Financial literacy is linked to financial well-being and decision making. While financial literacy and numeracy skills are strongly related, the relevance of different aspects of numeracy (mental arithmetic, math achievement, and numerical reasoning) for financial literacy has not yet been examined. Data were collected from 88 cognitively healthy adults, mean age = 50 years (SD = 15); mean education = 15 years (SD = 2); 61% females; with 56% Caucasian, 36% Black, and 90% non-Hispanic. Financial literacy was measured with the widely used Big Three scale, and numeracy was measured with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III, Arithmetic subtest; the Wide Range Achievement Test-IV, Math Computation subtest; and the Weller's Abbreviated Numeracy Scale (WANS). Regressions analyses were conducted with financial literacy as the outcome variable and each numeracy measure along with demographics (age, sex, and education) as the predictors. In all the models, only the numeracy measures were significant as individual predictors, with numerical reasoning holding the strongest association with financial literacy, followed by mental arithmetic and math achievement. The current study supports the existing literature that numeracy is important for financial literacy, and provides empirical evidence for the specific contributions of individual numeracy measures that clinicians may use to garner impressions about financial skills.

Indexed as

LiteracyAdultEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleMathematicsMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisFinancial literacymath achievementmathematical and numerical skillsmental mathnumerical reasoning

Identifiers

PMID32795202
PMCPMC8720496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.