Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32795185›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2020

Exploration of PCORnet Data Resources for Assessing Use of Molecular-Guided Cancer Treatment.

Ryan M Carnahan, Lemuel R Waitman, Mary E Charlton, Mary C Schroeder, Aaron D Bossler, W Scott Campbell, James R Campbell, Bradley D McDowell, Nicholas C Smith, Brian M Gryzlak and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Association of prior treatment with nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates on outcomes of COVID-19 positive patients.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ryan M CarnahanDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Lemuel R WaitmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS.
Mary E CharltonDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, and the Iowa Cancer Registry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Mary C SchroederDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Aaron D BosslerDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
W Scott CampbellDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE.
James R CampbellDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Bradley D McDowellHolden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Nicholas C SmithInstitute for Clinical and Transitional Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Brian M GryzlakDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Elizabeth A ChrischillesDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Christopher K Laubenthal · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
RADx-UP: Improving the Response of Local Urban and Rural Communities to Disparities in Covid-19 TestingUL1TR002366 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Mario Castro, JAMES STEVEN LEEDER · 2017 to 2026
$44.3M
The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR002537 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HANSEN, MARLAN R, WINOKUR, PATRICIA · 2018 to 2022
$20.0M
Deploying ONC national Standards in Support of Metadata for Big Data Research Warehouse Management of Repurposed Laboratory, Pathology & Patient Findings Data From the EHR.U01HG009455 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI CAMPBELL, WALTER SCOTT · 2016 to 2018
$1.7M
Building a patient-centered cancer data mart in a rural stateR50CA243692 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MCDOWELL, BRADLEY D · 2019 to 2023
$490k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002366NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002537NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NCI NIH HHS R50 CA243692NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExamine the ability of PCORnet data resources to investigate molecular-guided cancer treatment. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients (N = 86,154) had single primary solid tumors (diagnosed 2013-2017) from hospital oncology registries linked to the PCORnet Common Data Model (CDM) at 11 medical institutions. Molecular and anatomic test procedures and oral and infused therapies were identified with Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes, RxNorm Concept Unique Identifier, and National Drug Codes from CDM tables. Chart review (2 institutions, n = 213) for advanced colorectal cancer and Medicare claims linkages (7 institutions, n = 1,731) for breast cancer explored options for increasing electronic data capture.

resultsMolecular testing prevalence detected via analyte-specific molecular CPT/HCPCS codes was 5.5% (n = 4,784); for the nonspecific anatomic pathology codes, for which only some testing is performed to guide therapy selection, it was an additional 44.8% (n = 38,610). Molecular-guided therapy prevalence was 5% (n = 4,289). Testing and treatment were most common with stage IV disease and varied across cancer types and study institutions (testing, 0%-10.4%; treatment, 0.8%-8.4%). Therapy-concordant test results were found in charts for all 36 treated patients with colorectal cancer at the 2 institutions, 3 (8.3%) of whom received treatment outside the institution. Breast cancer Medicare claims linkage increased rates of identified testing from 62.7%-98.9% and treatment from 3.9%-8.2%.

conclusionAlthough a minority of patients received molecular-guided therapies, the majority had testing that could guide cancer treatment. Claims data extended electronic data capture for therapies and test orders but often was uninformative for types of test ordered. Test results continue to require text data curation from narrative pathology reports.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMedicareAgedCurrent Procedural TerminologyHumansRegistriesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32795185
PMCPMC7469597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.