Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32794660›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2020

[Expert consensus on the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers using tibial transverse transport (2020)].

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Transverse Tibial Bone Transfer in the Treatment of Diabetes Foot Ulcer: A Pilot Study.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ilizarov first reported the tibial transverse transport (TTT) for limb regeneration and functional reconstruction. The law of tension-stress could activate and enhance the regenerative potentials of living tissues, leading to growth or regeneration of muscles, fascia, blood vessels, and nerves simultaneously. Ilizarov discovered the phenomenon of rich vascular network formation during distraction osteogenesis process, but he did not apply this technique purposely to reconstruct microcirculation. Chinese orthopedic surgeons first used the TTT to treat lower extremity vascular lesions and diabetic foot ulcers. At present, some small sample clinical studies showed that the TTT could reconstruct microvascular network in the lower limbs of diabetic foot and promote the healing of foot ulcers. The use of TTT could significantly reduce the overall risk of diabetic foot complication especially the amputation risk. This expert consensus is initiated by the Chinese Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons (CAOS), Taskforce Group of Tibial Cortex Transverse Transport Technique for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers. This expert consensus provides clear recommendations for indications, contraindications, principles for surgical procedures, preoperative and postoperative management, which maximize the success rate for TTT surgery in treatment of severe diabetic foot ulcers.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootFoot UlcerAmputation, SurgicalConsensusDiabetes MellitusHumansTibiadiabetic foot ulcersexpert consensusTibia transverse transport

Identifiers

PMID32794660
PMCPMC8171904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.