Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32794634›Full record

Observational studyCancer medicine2020

The impact of routine Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) use on overall survival in cancer patients: Results of a population-based retrospective matched cohort analysis.

Lisa Barbera, Rinku Sutradhar, Hsien Seow, Nicole Mittmann, Doris Howell, Craig C Earle, Qing Li, Deva Thiruchelvam

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Symptom Management Versus Usual Care After Lung Cancer Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A nationwide, longitudinal collection of patient-reported outcomes from prostate cancer patients and controls.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Evaluating an electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring system in patients with prostate cancer in routine clinical care: a prospective observational study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and cancer symptom reporting: a matched retrospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa BarberaInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8302-4117
Rinku SutradharInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0320-6042
Hsien SeowInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6701-1714
Nicole MittmannSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Doris HowellUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Craig C EarleInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Qing LiInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Deva ThiruchelvamInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CASunnybrook Hospital · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) is a validated instrument whose use has been standardized in the Ontario cancer system to measure symptoms among ambulatory cancer patients. The objective was to examine the effect of ESAS exposure on overall survival. We hypothesized, a priori, that patients exposed to ESAS would have higher rates of overall survival than those who were not exposed.

methodsThis was a retrospective matched cohort study of adults diagnosed with cancer between 2007 and 2015. Patients were considered exposed if they were screened with ESAS at least once during the study period. Their first ESAS screening date defined the index date. Each exposed patient was matched randomly to a cancer patient without ESAS using a combination of hard matching (4 variables) and propensity score matching (14 variables). Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression were used to evaluate the impact of ESAS exposure on survival.

resultsThere were 128,893 pairs well matched on all baseline characteristics. The probability of survival within the first 5 years was higher among those exposed to ESAS compared to those who were not (81.9% vs. 76.4% at 1 year, 68.3% vs. 66.1% at 3 years, 61.9% vs. 61.4% at 5 years, P-value < .0001). In the multivariable Cox regression model, ESAS was significantly associated with a decreased mortality risk (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.47-0.49).

conclusionsOur results show that ESAS exposure is associated with improved survival in cancer patients. This provides real world evidence of the impact of routine symptom assessment in cancer care.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresSymptom AssessmentAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOntarioPredictive Value of TestsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime Factorscohort studyNeoplasmspatient reported outcome measurespropensity scoresurvivalsymptom assessment

Identifiers

PMID32794634
PMCPMC7541161
OpenAlexW3049134616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.