Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32794618›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2021

THEIA™ development, and testing of artificial intelligence-based primary triage of diabetic retinopathy screening images in New Zealand.

E Vaghefi, S Yang, L Xie, S Hill, O Schmiedel, R Murphy, D Squirrell

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. How early can we detect diabetic retinopathy? A narrative review of imaging tools for structural assessment of the retina.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

E VaghefiToku Eyes, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9482-3168
S YangSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Auckland, New Zealand.
L XieSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Auckland, New Zealand.
S HillDepartment of Ophthalmology, Auckland, New Zealand.
O SchmiedelAuckland Diabetes Centre, Auckland District Health Board.
R MurphySchool of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand.
D SquirrellToku Eyes, Auckland, New Zealand.
Auckland City Hospital · NZAuckland District Health Board · NZAuckland Institute of Studies · NZNew Zealand Christians in Science · NZSUNY College of Optometry · USUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo develop and evaluate an artificial intelligence triage system with high sensitivity for detecting referable diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy, while maintaining high specificity for non-referable disease, for clinical implementation within the New Zealand national diabetic retinopathy screening programme.

methodsThe THEIA™ artificial intelligence system for retinopathy and maculopathy screening, was developed at Toku Eyes using routinely collected retinal screening datasets from two of the largest district health boards in Auckland, New Zealand: the Auckland District Health Board and the Counties Manukau District Health Board. All retinal images from consecutive individuals receiving retinal screening between January 2009 and December 2018 were used. Images were labelled as non-sight-threatening, potentially referable or sight-threatening for New Zealand implementation, or as referable (potentially referable + sight-threatening)/non-referable (non-sight-threatening) for global comparison.

resultsData from 32 354 unique people with diabetes (63 843 when including multiple visits) were available, of which 95-97%, 0.9-2.4% and 1.1-3.1% were categorized as non-sight-threatening, potentially referable and sight-threatening, respectively. Using the referable/non-referable categories, THEIA achieved overall sensitivity of 94% (95% CI 92-95) in the Auckland District Health Board and 95% (95% CI 92-97) in the Counties Manukau District Health Board datasets, while preserving specificity of 63% (95% CI 62-64) for the Auckland District Health Board and 61% (95% CI 60-62) for the Counties Manukau District Health Board. Implementing THEIA into a New Zealand national diabetic screening programme could significantly reduce the manual grading load.

conclusionTHEIA, an artificial intelligence tool to assist in clinical decision-making, tailored to the needs of the New Zealand national diabetic screening programme, delivered high sensitivity for detecting referable retinopathy within the multi-ethnic New Zealand population with diabetes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsChildDiabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImplementation ScienceMaleMass ScreeningMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID32794618
PMCPMC8048953
OpenAlexW3049125326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.