Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32794395›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of dentistry2020

Effect of biofilm exposure on marginal integrity of composite restorations.

Amanda M Mushashe, Sarah A de Almeida, Jack L Ferracane, Justin Merritt, Giselle M Correr

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A novel methacrylate derivative polymer that resists bacterial cell-mediated biodegradation.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda M MushasheSchool of Health Sciences, University Positivo, Curitiba, PR, Brazil, stefano.ardu@unige.ch.
Sarah A de AlmeidaGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Jack L FerracaneDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Justin MerrittDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Giselle M CorrerSchool of Health Sciences, University Positivo, Curitiba, PR, Brazil, gmcnolasco@gmail.com.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Advancing studies of polymicrobial diseases via streptococcal geneticsR35DE028252 · NIDCR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MERRITT, JUSTIN · 2018 to 2025
$7.8M
NIDCR NIH HHS R35 DE028252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effect of bacterial exposure on the marginal integrity of dentin-resin interfaces for composites with and without bioactive glass (BAG).

methodsCavity preparations of 5 mm width and 1.5 mm depth were machined into dentin disks by means of a computer controlled milling system. After applying the bonding agent, cavity preparations (n=3-5) were restored by incremental technique with experimental resin composites (50:50 BisGMA/TEGDMA: 72wt% filler) with different filler compositions: control - 67 wt% silanated strontium glass and 5wt% aerosol-silica filler and BAG - 57 wt% silanated strontium glass and 15 wt% BAG-65 wt% silica. Samples were then stored in sterile Todd-Hewitt media or co-incubated with Streptococcus mutans (UA 159), at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 1-2 weeks. For samples co-incubated with a living biofilm, a luciferase assay was performed in order to assess its viability. Surfaces were impressed before and after each storage condition and replicas examined in a scanning electron microscope. Using image analysis software (Image J), the discontinuous margins percentage (%DM) was quantitatively assessed. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (α= 0.05).

resultsGap size ranged between 7-23 µm. The bacterial exposure significantly increased the %DM in both groups predominantly due to the formation of new gap regions. There was no difference between control and BAG composites regarding %DM and the biofilm viability. Bacterial exposure promoted degradation of composite restoration marginal integrity, with no difference between composites with and without BAG. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The samples incubated with living biofilm had a higher gap percentage in the margins, confirming the negative effect of cariogenic bacteria on margin degradation. The parameters defined for such synergy can help to understand the multi-factorial aspect of marginal discontinuity and therefore, predict the behavior of composite restorations subjected to the challenging oral environment.

Indexed as

Composite ResinsDental Cavity PreparationBiofilmsDental Marginal AdaptationDental Restoration, PermanentGlassMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningStreptococcus mutansComposite Resins

Identifiers

PMID32794395
PMCPMC8136684
OpenAlexW3049460833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.