ArticleInternational journal of dental hygiene2020
Non-surgical peri-implantitis treatment using a pocket irrigator device; clinical, microbiological, radiographical and patient-centred outcomes-A pilot study.
Article in International journal of dental hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07700628 (Treatment of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Pockets With a Novel Collagen Hydrogel), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Pockets With a Novel Collagen Hydrogel: A Multicenter Retrospective Study on the Clinical Use of the H42 Medical Device
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical and non-surgical debridement for the treatment of peri-implantitis: a two-center 12-month randomized trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Trial
- Efficacy of oral irrigators compared to other interdental aids for managing peri-implant diseases: a systematic review.BDJ open · 2025Article
- A scoping review of diagnostic techniques used for the detection of peri-implantitis around endosseous dental implants.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Review
- Experimental models for peri-implant diseases: a narrative review.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Review
- Oral Irrigation Devices: A Scoping Review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Article
- In-vitro biofilm removal from TiUnite® implant surface with an air polishing and two different plasma devices.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Favorable subgingival plaque microbiome shifts are associated with clinical treatment for peri-implant diseases.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Article
- Shift in the submucosal microbiome of diseased peri-implant sites after non-surgical mechanical debridement treatment.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Berberine ameliorates the LPS-induced imbalance of osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation in rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.Molecular medicine reports · 2021Article
- Non-surgical peri-implantitis treatment using a pocket irrigator device; clinical, microbiological, radiographical and patient-centred outcomes-A pilot study.International journal of dental hygiene · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess the effect of a pocket irrigator/evacuator device (IED) in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn total 24 patients having 38 implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis were included in this study. Peri-implant pockets were irrigated six times in three consecutive weeks. The primary outcome was bleeding on probing (BoP). Secondary outcome parameters included plaque index (Pl), suppuration on probing (SoP), probing pocket depth (PPD), marginal bone loss (MBL), presence and numbers of periodontal pathogens. Parameters were assessed at baseline and 3 months after the last treatment. Treatment pain perception was scored using the visual analog scale (VAS) after the first and last treatment.
resultsAt 3 months, IED treatment revealed significant reduction of peri-implant BoP (71% [±20] vs 57% [±28] [P = .014]) and peri-implant plaque scores (10 [±14] to 5 [±9] [P = .039] [T0 vs T3 respectively]). Significant reduction in mean peri-implant PPD from 4.92 mm (SD ± 1.28) to 4.66 mm (SD ± 1.35) (P = .041) was observed. In addition, a reduction in VAS pain score between the first and the last (6th) treatment was found (P = .039). No reduction in SoP (P = .088) was found. No changes in mean periodontal full mouth plaque, BOP, SOP and PPD levels, MBL and microbiological outcomes were found.
conclusionBeneficial clinical effects in terms of BoP, PPD and PI were found at 3 months after IED treatment. However, the IED does not seem to effectively treat peri-implantitis in terms of disease resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.