Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32794298›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2020

Impact of patient isolation on emergency department length of stay: A retrospective cohort study using the Registry for Emergency Care.

Gerard M O'Reilly, Rob D Mitchell, Biswadev Mitra, Michael P Noonan, Ryan Hiller, Lisa Brichko, Carl Luckhoff, Andrew Paton, De Villiers Smit, Peter A Cameron

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Adverse events and preventive measures related to COVID-19 vaccines.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gerard M O'ReillyEmergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5763-917X
Rob D MitchellEmergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6422-3348
Biswadev MitraEmergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0508-2450
Michael P NoonanEmergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ryan HillerEmergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lisa BrichkoEmergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Carl LuckhoffEmergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew PatonEmergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
De Villiers SmitEmergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Peter A CameronEmergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1443-557X
Alfred Health · AUNational Trauma Research Institute · AUAmbulance Victoria · AUCabrini Hospital · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1142691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe number of patients with suspected COVID-19 presenting to Australian EDs continues to impose a burden on healthcare services. Isolation is an important aspect of infection prevention and control, but has been associated with undesirable consequences among hospital inpatients. The aim of the present study was to determine if isolation is associated with an increased length of stay (LOS) in the ED.

methodsThe Registry for Emergency Care Project is a prospective cohort study with a series of nested sub-studies. The present study was a retrospective analysis of adult patients allocated an Australasian Triage Scale category of 1 or 2 who presented to a tertiary ED between 18 and 31 May 2020. The primary outcome was ED LOS. Regression methods were used to determine the independent association between ED isolation and LOS.

resultsThere were 447 patients who met inclusion criteria, of which 123 (28%) were managed in isolation. The median (interquartile range) ED LOS was 259 (210-377) min for the isolation group and 204 (126-297) min for the non-isolation group, a difference in median ED LOS of 55 min (P < 0.001). Isolation was independently associated with a 23% increase in ED LOS (P = 0.002) and doubled the odds of an ED stay of more than 4 h (adjusted odds ratio 2.2 [1.4-3.4], P = 0.001).

conclusionConsistent with the anecdotal experience of Australian ED clinicians, the present study demonstrated an increased ED LOS for patients managed in isolation. Enhanced infection prevention and control precautions will be required during and beyond the current pandemic, creating significant ongoing challenges for emergency care systems.

Indexed as

AustraliaCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Emergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPatient IsolationPneumonia, ViralRegistriesRetrospective StudiesCOVID-19emergencyisolationquality improvementregistry

Identifiers

PMID32794298
PMCPMC7461400
OpenAlexW3048935200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.