ArticleChemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry2020
Buffer Influence on the Amino Acid Silica Interaction.
Article in Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemical control of colloidal self-assembly driven by the electrosolvation force.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Synergized Effects of Amino Acids and NaCl to Enhance Silicate Mineral Dissolution in Aqueous Environments for Efficient Atmospheric COEnvironmental science & technology · 2024Article
- Rapid Multi-Omics Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Purification of a peptide tagged protein via an affinity chromatographic process with underivatized silica.Engineering in life sciences · 2021Article
- Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Composite Materials for Batch or Chromatographic Biomolecule Separation.Nanoscale research letters · 2021Article
- Buffer Influence on the Amino Acid Silica Interaction.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-surface interactions are exploited in various processes in life sciences and biotechnology. Many of such processes are performed in presence of a buffer system, which is generally believed to have an influence on the protein-surface interaction but is rarely investigated systematically. Combining experimental and theoretical methodologies, we herein demonstrate the strong influence of the buffer type on protein-surface interactions. Using state of the art chromatographic experiments, we measure the interaction between individual amino acids and silica, as a reference to understand protein-surface interactions. Among all the 20 proteinogenic amino acids studied, we found that arginine (R) and lysine (K) bind most strongly to silica, a finding validated by free energy calculations. We further measured the binding of R and K at different pH in presence of two different buffers, MOPS (3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid) and TRIS (tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane), and find dramatically different behavior. In presence of TRIS, the binding affinity of R/K increases with pH, whereas we observe an opposite trend for MOPS. These results can be understood using a multiscale modelling framework combining molecular dynamics simulation and Langmuir adsorption model. The modelling approach helps to optimize buffer conditions in various fields like biosensors, drug delivery or bio separation engineering prior to the experiment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.