Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32794126›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Diagnostic performance of quantitative, semi-quantitative, and visual analysis of dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging: a validation study with invasive fractional flow reserve.

Yuehua Li, Xu Dai, Zhigang Lu, Chengxing Shen, Jiayin Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Noninvasive Coronary Physiological Assessment Derived From Computed Tomography.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuehua Li *Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Rd,, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Xu Dai *Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Rd,, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Zhigang LuDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Rd, Shanghai, China.
Chengxing ShenDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Rd, Shanghai, China.
Jiayin ZhangInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Rd,, Shanghai, 200233, China. andrewssmu@msn.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7383-7571
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

Medical Guidance Scientific Research Support Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission 19411965100National Natural Science Foundation of China 81671678Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province 81671673Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support 20161428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the diagnostic performance of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF), MBF

methodsConsecutive patients with chest pain and intermediate-to-high pre-test probability of obstructive coronary artery disease were prospectively enrolled. All patients were referred for dynamic CT-MPI and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements within 4 weeks. Absolute MBF, MBF

resultsSixty-two patients with 95 target vessels were included for final analysis. The mean radiation dose for dynamic CT-MPI was 3.0 (2.2-4.0) mSv. The mean lesion-based absolute MBF value was significantly lower in ischemic segments than that in non-ischemic segments (78.0 (65.0-86.0) mL/min/100 mL vs. 133.0 (117.5-163.8) mL/min/100 mL, p < 0.001). Similarly, the lesion-based MBF

conclusionsAbsolute MBF and MBF KEY POINTS: • The mean MBF and MBF

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialMyocardial Perfusion ImagingCoronary AngiographyHumansPerfusionPredictive Value of TestsSeverity of Illness IndexTomography, X-Ray ComputedAngiographyCoronary artery diseaseMultidetector computed tomographyMyocardial fractional flow reservePercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID32794126
OpenAlexW3049590470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.