Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32794082›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2020

Epi-off-lenticule-on corneal collagen cross-linking in thin keratoconic corneas.

Carlo Cagini, F Riccitelli, M Messina, F Piccinelli, G Torroni, D Said, A Al Maazmi, H S Dua

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating the rationale and outcomes of crosslinking corneal stromal lenticules: a systematic review with exploratory pooled analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of keratoconus.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlo CaginiDepartment of Biomedical and Surgical Sciences, Ophthalmology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. carlo.cagini@unipg.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3812-9219
F RiccitelliDepartment of Biomedical and Surgical Sciences, Ophthalmology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
M MessinaDepartment of Biomedical and Surgical Sciences, Ophthalmology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
F PiccinelliDepartment of Biomedical and Surgical Sciences, Ophthalmology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
G TorroniDepartment of Biomedical and Surgical Sciences, Ophthalmology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
D SaidLarry A Donoso Laboratory for Eye Research, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Academic Section of Ophthalmology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
A Al MaazmiLarry A Donoso Laboratory for Eye Research, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Academic Section of Ophthalmology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
H S DuaLarry A Donoso Laboratory for Eye Research, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Academic Section of Ophthalmology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
University of Perugia · ITUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) performed on overlaying a corneal lenticule to thin recipient corneas of progressive keratoconus (KC) patients.

methodsIn this study were enrolled eyes of patients affected by progressive KC with a minimum corneal thickness less than 400 µm, after overlaying a lenticule of human corneal stroma prepared with the femtosecond laser. The lenticules used were 100 µm thick and of 8.5 mm diameter in all the cases. Both the host cornea and the lenticules were subjected to epithelial debridement. CXL was carried out according to the standard protocol. Visual acuity, refraction, slit-lamp examination, endothelial cell density, pachymetry and keratometry, anterior segment tomography (AS-OCT) and confocal microscopy were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

resultsCXL was performed in 10 eyes of 8 patients (main age 23), corneal thickness range 379-414 µm, mean 387.6 µm. One patient was lost at follow-up. In all other cases, visual acuity and the endothelial cell density remained stable over a 12-month follow-up. Preoperative mean K1 and mean K2 were 46.91 ± 1.9 and 50.75 ± 2.93, respectively, and at 12 months mean K1 was 47.36 ± 2.66 and mean K2 50.53 ± 3.35. The AS-OCT clearly showed a demarcation line in all patients at 1, 3 (mean depth 283 µm and 267 µm, respectively) and in some cases at 6 months. Reduced keratocyte density and stromal oedema were observed immediately up to 1 month after treatment, while a slight subepithelial haze was present at 1-month and completely disappeared by 6 months.

conclusionThis new technique seems to offer a therapeutic opportunity for young patients suffering from progressive KC with very thin corneas, in which the standard treatment is not indicate, and delay or avoid the need for a corneal transplant.

Indexed as

KeratoconusPhotochemotherapyAdultCollagenCorneaCorneal StromaCorneal TopographyCross-Linking ReagentsHumansPhotosensitizing AgentsRiboflavinUltraviolet RaysYoung AdultCollagenCross-Linking ReagentsPhotosensitizing AgentsRiboflavinCollagen cross-linkingKeratoconusThin corneaTreatment

Identifiers

PMID32794082
PMCPMC7669785
OpenAlexW3049240776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.