ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021
Outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy in challenging achalasia patients: a long-term follow-up study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics and predictors of technically difficult peroral endoscopic myotomy in esophageal motility disorders: a high-volume center analysis of 676 procedures.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Review
- Role of endoscopy in patients with achalasia.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Per-oral endoscopic myotomy is safe and effective for pediatric patients with achalasia: A long-term follow-up study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Submucosal endoscopy: the present and future.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Safety and Efficacy of the Supine Position with the Right Shoulder Raised versus the Left Lateral Position in Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia: A Large-Sample Retrospective Study.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2022Article
- Modified Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Technique for Type II Achalasia: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2022Article
- Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia after failed pneumatic dilation.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Double tunnel technique reduces technical failure during POEM in cases with severe submucosal fibrosis.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Safety and efficacy of biodegradable stents in octogenarian patients with esophageal achalasia.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been shown to be effective for achalasia patients. Our study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes of POEM for challenging patients.
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 278 challenging achalasia patients who underwent POEM from January 2011 to July 2019. The outcomes of POEM such as procedure time, adverse events, and risk factors of adverse events were analyzed.
resultsOf the 278 patients (134 males and 144 females) with a mean age of 47.0 years, 103, 223, 93, and 98 patients had prior treatment and were Ling classification IIc/III, submucosal fibrosis (SMF) classification 2/3, and esophageal mucosa in achalasia (EMIA) classification c/d/e/f, respectively. The mean procedure time was 45.9 min (range, 15-158 min). The mean length of the tunnel and myotomy were 10.1 cm (range, 7-17 cm) and 6.6 cm (range, 5-13 cm), respectively. The major adverse event rate was 14.1%, while the minor adverse event rate was 4.7%. SMF classification 2/3 was an independent risk factor for incomplete tunneling, adverse events, and procedure time ≥ 90 min. The mean follow-up time was 37.2 months (range 1-99 months). The mean Eckardt score and esophageal sphincter pressure were both significantly declined postoperatively. The clinical success rate was 95.6%.
conclusionPOEM is safe and effective for challenging achalasia patients. SMF classification grade 2/3 was shown to be an independent risk factor for incomplete tunneling, adverse events, and procedure time ≥ 90 min. For these patients, POEM should be performed by experienced endoscopists, some cases are better served with traditional surgery, such as minimally invasive Heller with Dor fundoplication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.