ArticleClinical oral investigations2021
Differences in skeletal growth patterns: an exploratory approach using elliptic Fourier analysis.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mandibular shape prediction model using machine learning techniques.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- [Frequency of retained third molars in relation to facial biotype. a cross-sectional study].Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveApply elliptic Fourier analysis to find shape differences among the hypodivergent, normodivergent, and hyperdivergent growth patterns in skeletal classes I, II and, III in mandibular and maxillary curves and evaluate the discriminatory capacity of these differences. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 626 adult patients were included: 354 Brazilian patients (52 with tomographic information and 302 with radiographic information) and 272 Colombian patients with radiographic information. Lateral views were selected. The maxillary and mandibular curves were digitized. Elliptic Fourier analysis was employed considering with 20 harmonics as well as filtering size, rotation, and translation properties. One-way non-parametric MANOVA was employed to determine differences. A confusion matrix tool was employed to analyze the discriminatory capacity of the model.
resultsSignificant shape differences in the mandibular and maxillary contours were found among the hypodivergent, normodivergent, and hyperdivergent growth patterns in classes I, II, and III (p < 0.05). The accuracies obtained from the confusion matrix were respectively 74.1, 79.5, and 90.1% in classes I, II, and III in the mandibular curves and respectively 71.9, 73.9, and 75% in classes I, II, and III in the maxillary curves.
conclusionsElliptic Fourier analysis can be used to find shape differences with an acceptable discriminatory capacity, especially in the mandible contour. Maxillary and mandibular bone curves each significantly defined facial biotypes regardless of the size and position properties. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This exploration offers a way to quantify mandibular morphology for the construction of an economic mandibular prediction system applicable to the Latin American population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.